How about this one?

[metalman]

It doesn't take a lot of brains to make an opinion on who has more faith out of the two. There has to be a LOT of faith to beleive that a spirit created everything just as there has to be probably an equal amount for scientists to beleive that it was evolution. Hail. For all everyone knows, the dating process they use could be totally wrong. Ya know.



I haven't looked at most of them. I thought of this subject and asked about people's opinions. Nothing more/nothing less.





I'm not in any boat. Just because I don't choose to learn about religion, doesn't classify me in any way.

First I am glad we settled that, indeed it was as I suspected, you havent studied the subject much. Nothing unusual...youre typical of most people in this specific sense. No shame or insult infered.

Secondly, it isnt about any specific religion. If you want to disbelieve most of what preachers/priests/rabbis/religions etc say I am already there dude. They tell a ton of lies! However that doesnt change the truth from being what it is one bit. Its for us to discover/learn what THAT truth may be.

The items I have mentioned are not "religious" in nature, theyre scientific. The problem is this...they completely destroy evolutionary theory's cornerstones. Yet they (and other scienctific discoveries) are in complete harmony with a "creator" or "Intelligent design". Therein lies the problem for evolutionary theory. Therein lies the reason I say it takes more faith to believe evolution. The rolex watch scenario I gave is actually MORE plausible then evolution given these facts, yet is in fact basiclly what evolutionists would have us all believe, only they even wish for us to believe this origin in in more detail, on multiple levels, multiple species. The complexity of the human body alone with its delicate balance of electrochemical systems came about by accident? Over time???? Just by pieces bumping together?? Talk about a high faith belief!

You know what the REAL issue is for creation vs. evolution I suspect??? Man does NOT wish to believe in a judgement or accountibility for his actions. If man accepts even a hint of creation he then is faced with at least the possibilty of judgement, heaven, hell etc etc etc and all of that. I think thats possibly the greatest influence to mankind when considering the origin of the world/universe etc. We just don't want to be accountable in any eternal sense.

Anyway...nice chattin with ya. Gotta go work on a car.
Metalman

[quickdodge®]

indeed it was as I suspected, you havent studied the subject much.

I never said I had studied it.

...youre typical of most people in this specific sense. No shame or insult infered.

If it wasn't an insult, indulge me in the context to which you posted this. Cool chatting with you, as well. Later, QD.

[metalman]

If it wasn't an insult, indulge me in the context to which you posted this. Cool chatting with you, as well. Later, QD.

That being that I mean no insult in pointing out (what my original comment pertained to) that you havent studied creation/evolution science much. Its not intended to infer that youre stupid, unable to learn or anything of that nature. Neither should it be considered a personal attack. As I recall youre the one calling me names...not vice versa. Thats cool, I've been called worse.

[ISAtlanta300]

all right, all right guys.... LOL both of you are cool peeps... let's get back on topic, shall we?

[b@d @pple]

i like dinosaurs...fuck the bible

[sina518]

i like dinosaurs...fuck the bible

[b@d @pple]

sina dont be mad that i invited that little hooker to daytona..i just wanna get her naked and drunk