Quote Originally Posted by sport_122
I didn't quote the Bible.

and I would agree...the convenience for the skeptic is that in formation of logical discussion you are not supposed to use anything which is a part of that which is to be proved to prove the existence of it. Because anything that flows from a source is "not neutral" and will prove that source. Like the Bible as God's breathed word therefore it can not be used to prove him because it presupposes that he is real.

So for a person who is a skeptic NOTHING is suitable evidence, because (at least for the judao-christian) ALL things are created by God and speak to his existence. So why don't you give us all example of suitable evidence?
other people are.

i'm pretty skeptic, so that's why none of reading the bible makes any sense to me.