It means you make bad decisions, like routing against UGA.
It means you make bad decisions, like routing against UGA.
Another funny note- everyone goes by the rankings- look at them. All they are is votes from certain individuals- they really mean absolutely nothing. I mean Marshall Faulk, if i remember exactly won the heismann with an unranked team. They dominated that year and remained unranked. How can a team with a loss really be rated higher than teams with no losses? Also when was the last time an SEC team was actually ranked #1 and/or won a national championship and was actually praised in the media- don't say Auburn or LSU because they were pushed aside. Auburn had to "share" the championship with USC but USC got all the publicity and their schedule was not nearly as tough as Auburns that year. LSU got 15 minutes of fame and then no one even talked about them. I think the whole rankings is overrated and just another way for the schools and stations to rake in more money. When was the last time you say a smaller school with a tough schedule that did well get a good ranking- never because of the way they rank them and vote. Another example- look at all the different rankings- none of them are ever the same- all of them will usually be different with the exception of #1 and 2.
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
haha, fair enough, trash talking is fair game...but damn, its in my blood, Tech all the way FTW.Originally Posted by HalfBaked
BTW, your definately a UGA fan, routing??? I believe its rooting
![]()
L@t3 N|GHt Cr3\/\/ and Hump Her Crew member
Originally Posted by Ericp
WIth a sentence like that I feel safe to say that you want/do/did attend UGA![]()
Yea well whatever. I've been drinking. Games like that can't leave fans sober.Originally Posted by Tbird_guy
lolOriginally Posted by Nittanys1
Last edited by Hulud; 09-23-2006 at 04:33 PM.
Val for President
sec championship caliber? talk about jumping the gun, who have you played so far this year? 3 nobody's and then a bottom feeder in the sec. come talk your shit after you've beaten the triumvirate (that'd be UT, AU, and UF).Originally Posted by JuicedCpe
guess he wont be comin back lololol
Val for President
Its coming... We may not win all of them but less see, UT- already one SEC loss and they were nearly beaten by a non ranked team also. I have seen the practices first hand and they definately have a team capable of repeating again this year.
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
Who are you talking about?Originally Posted by Hulud
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
You realize USC was 2nd in the SEC east last year right?Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
Bottom feeder? Please!
the person he was quotingOriginally Posted by JuicedCpe
![]()
Val for President
really, and what qualifications do you possess that enables you to professionally assess how well a college football team is doing and what they're capable? are you an nfl scout? maybe a one time div 1a football coach?Originally Posted by JuicedCpe
![]()
always living in the past, like a true uga fanOriginally Posted by HalfBaked
how many times has usc finished SECOND in the sec east in the past 10 yrs? much less first? one time 2nd place finishes does not remove the bottom feeder tag from a perennial underachiever.
I might be but still not sure if you were referring to me. If it was, well I have other priorities rather than sitting right here and constantly refreshing. Considering my son woke from his nap and I had to put the bike away after washing it, there are alot of other things that I have going on.
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
How many years has spurrier coached them?Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
God damn. You don't know shit do you? Who do you root for anyways?
Hmmm... you never know what I do for a living do you or who I know real well. Do you work for ESPN or any other "sports authority" to base your decisions on. Man are your panties in a wad?Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
ever heard of beginners luck? and are u interested in making a wager that they won't finish 2nd this yr?Originally Posted by HalfBaked
i don't know "shit", but i do know quite a few factsand i rep the GT, thnx for asking.
JuicedCpe
if your so sure UGA's gonna win the SEC championships, pm me we can put a friendly wager on it now if you like
Val for President
touche, but that goes double for you as well.Originally Posted by JuicedCpe
panties in a wad? how original. yeah lemme tell u, i'm sitting here w/steam blowing out my ears :jerkit:
If you rep the GT you don't know shit.
So you are saying, go into the swamp and beating the gators like spurrier did last year is all luck?
Tech's only decent opponent this year was ND and everyone knows they were extremely overrated.
yeah, i want in on that wager as well, talk about easy moneyOriginally Posted by Hulud
![]()
Auburn will win it.Originally Posted by Hulud
Georgia will play in the game though.
thanks for stating the obvious lolOriginally Posted by HalfBaked
Auburn FTW
undefeated
Val for President
Sorry but I don't place wagers. I am pretty sure of it but quit gambling several years ago.
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
its cool
Val for President
so i don't know shit but you do? well you are a uga fan, i guess you probably know shit quite well...Originally Posted by HalfBaked
luck, as well as the fact that UF had a new coach last yr and a complete offensive overhaul.
tech's only DECENT opponent is ND? first off, we play miami, virginia tech and clemson, all solid teams in the acc (granted miami is finally having the season i've always wanted them to have). and secondly (proving just what a dumbass you truly are), you forgot we play uga every yr, so then by your own account, uga is not even a decent opponent??? i rest my case![]()
I don't believe Auburn will win it. Everyone said the same thing last year
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
Hey tech fan, sorry I didn't write my post in binary for you...Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
But I said "was" as in the past tense of "is". Therefore I was stating people they have played so far. You can check back to your post where you tried to comment on the strength of UGAs schedule so far...
I know Tech is in the ACC and I know that the ACC has decent teams who will beat Tech.
Blowing your entire paycheck gambling helped me realize that it wasn't worth it.Originally Posted by Hulud
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
^^^whoever wins the AU-UF game wins the SEC this yr.
Florida doesn't have a chance, they won't make it out of the east.
They have too tough of a schedule.
It will be interesting but overall though we (SEC) are still screwed as they seldom award the SEC the national championship. As long as there is 2 other undefeated teams this year in another conference, we will get screwed
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
first off, you meant to say tech GRAD. and you wouldn't know binary even though it consists of the only 2 numbers you know, 0 and 1.Originally Posted by HalfBaked
so we've had one decent opponent, once again i don't see how that has any bearing whatsoever on uga's 4 unranked opponents they've played thus far.Originally Posted by HalfBaked
oh you know that do you? then you should also know we beat 2 out of the 3 opponents in the acc i listed last year, since you're all about living in the past and all.Originally Posted by HalfBaked
see the thing is, being a tech fan i know damn well what kind of a football program we have, a 7-5 team that will go to a bowl game that we may or may not win. but see, the problem with just about every uga fans is that they're disillusioned and out of touch with reality. they think the "dawgs" are the shit every year and will win the sec and the national championship game every yr.
0 and 1? Like how tech started off the season of course. Had you phrased it 1 and 0 I'd have understood you better.Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
I believe that USC was ranked in 1 of the polls...and just because someone is unranked doesn't mean they aren't as quality of an opponent. Colorado and USC are better then UVA, Troy and who ever else you played.Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
That is because each year UGA has a shot at it. They have the talent and the schedule. While tech fans just know to accept the fact that they never will have a chance.Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
witty, you must've gotten that out of the humor for uga fans book i saw at barnes and noble.Originally Posted by HalfBaked
1 of the polls? what the one you made up for this argument?Originally Posted by HalfBaked
colorado and usc are better than uva and troy? where is your justification for that argument? troy has one of THE toughest schedules out there in 1a football (go ahead and look, i know you don't believe me) and they almost beat fsu in tally. whereas USC went down to the WIRE against FURMAN.
lol, of course i'm sure you're referring to the uga of the mark richt area, i know y'all weren't singing that same tune when jim donnan was still around. and as far as tech never having a chance, sorry if we have what they call "academic standards" (i apologize if that's not in your uga vocabulary).Originally Posted by HalfBaked
I would say so but you can't have everything- I mean when was the last time Harvard had a contending football team- LOL.Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
Hmmm.... never thought juice could be this much fun.
yeah but how big of a person are you for faulting someone for trying? shit last i checked tech still has a few national championships under their belt, the record for the most pts EVER scored in a college football game and arguably one of the best coaches ever (heisman). and hell even as an academic school, we still compete at a higher level than other schools of the same nature (most notably unc, wake, duke in our own conference) in not just football, but all sports.Originally Posted by JuicedCpe
btw, harvard is QUITE the football contender in their division (3 ivy league championships since '97, 11 all time).