ATTN: Rhys

[quickdodge®]

I dont think you got my point. What I am saying is the cost of cars and the level of income are complementary factors.

That's kind of a given, yes? Later, QD.

[isa2o3]

You'd be more right if the car was a high end car (Ferrari, Lambo, etc.). That would more than likely indicate wealth. But not the other way around. Looking at an owner of a Toyota or Honda is not (not all the time). Later, QD.

That's kind of a given, yes? Later, QD.

Given, meaning you agree they are complementary or given meaning it is obvious that I am arguing the fact that they are complementary?

If it is the first options then you see my point. If it is the second option, I am made this statement based on your post highlighted above (in bold)

[RandomGuy]

Given, meaning you agree they are complementary or given meaning it is obvious that I am arguing the fact that they are complementary?

If it is the first options then you see my point. If it is the second option, I am made this statement based on your post highlighted above (in bold)

[quickdodge®]

Given, meaning you agree they are complementary or given meaning it is obvious that I am arguing the fact that they are complementary?

If it is the first options then you see my point. If it is the second option, I am made this statement based on your post highlighted above (in bold)

I'm saying that it's obvious that the cost of cars and level of income are related (or complementary). For the most part, you have to have a high range of income to afford a high end car. Is that what you're trying to get across? Later, QD.

[isa2o3]

I'm saying that it's obvious that the cost of cars and level of income are related (or complementary). For the most part, you have to have a high range of income to afford a high end car. Is that what you're trying to get across? Later, QD.

Yes sir, we are on the same page.