Quote Originally Posted by GKtib®
*sigh*

blah blah blah... conspiracy theories are pretty much rooted in coincidences. therefore they've got about as much credibility as wikipedia.
Was written to PSINXS, who then replies...


Quote Originally Posted by PSINXS
oh how naive we can be. bush saying he wont lose before elected? not a coincidence? bush being related to obama and cheney? coincidence? obama winning popular vote? coincidence? i canguarantee obama will be next pres and the next pawn. annuit conceptus novos ordo seclorum is latin for: he has favored our undertakings. a new order of the secular world. concidence? wtf ever
Who then quotes stuff off Wiki

Quote Originally Posted by PSINXS
Dianetics is still employed and disseminated by the Church of Scientology, as reaching the state of "Clear" is a requirement to access Scientology's upper levels.

The scientific community has never recognized Hubbard's "Modern Science of Mental Health" as a valid scientific theory, and it has repeatedly been dismissed in print as pseudoscience. Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science by Martin Gardner includes an entire chapter on the subject as pseudoscience.

i dont **** with scientology. no thanx on that read. appreciate the info though

Who gets call out for copy + paste from Wiki



Anyone??? Anyone??? Am I the only one who thinks this is funny in some way?