There is no BASELEVEL S2k as you say, The car doesnt really have options, Hardtop is pretty much one of the ONLY options (Unless you add lip spoiler and rear wing) but the car pretty much comes with everything for the 34k price, No gimicky add ons like the BMWOriginally Posted by DunksWhore
and so in an effort to prove your point about the cost of a base model S versus a Z4 you choose the midlevel model....
.
Brett (One of the true OG's, No really... ask anyone)
'15 Chevy SS
'16 K7 SXL SWP
www.facebook.com/brett.lowenthal1
R.I.P Leisa, You are never forgotten - 10/7/08
I didn't introduce the notion of a base model S2k into this conversation(it was Mr Kidd that did) but for the sake of argument here you go:
http://www.edmunds.com/honda/s2000/2...202d202434354b
bret there is a base model because in 2008 there is the track edition cr
Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
-www.usedbarcode.net
Make it 91%, add me!! LOL
The Z4 is butt ass ugly, Its heavy, slow, Over rated, a b*tch car and has no back bone in the mountains or really anywhere, and unless you love to suck D*ck, dont buy a Z4.
I've personally seen more women driving the s2k than the Z4.
You had a Civic before didn't you? How many girls drive that?
So is the Civic then to be considered a bytch car?
[QUOTE=Mr. KiDD]bret there is a base model because in 2008 there is the track edition cr[/QUOTE
Thank you for clarifying that. At least one thing we agree on...
bmwZ=slow..
For a fair performance comparison, the $8K more expensive version of the Z4 was used since it was the one most competitive with the S2K in terms of 1/4 mile times and such. Had the comparison involved only price, then the Z4 Base could have be used. However, at that point the S2K pretty much walks away from the Z4 Base in terms of performance. The midlevel Z4 had to be used to compare the performance aspect. When weighing both price and performance (bang for buck) between the two models, you will wind up paying a lot more for a Z4 as to a comparible S2K.Go back to where you initially quoted the z4 as being 10k more than the S.
and so in an effort to prove your point about the cost of a base model S versus a Z4 you choose the midlevel model....
Depending on the price you're willing to pay.
Hope that helps to clear some of the fog.
.... holy ****.
Feel loved yet? lol
btw i drove the car home last night and i LOVE IT!!! its the 3.0 v6. not the 2.5.
im prob gonna buy it
lol im gonna have to read all these responses on my lunch break. lol
Which car? The Z4?
That said, the record shows that the Z4 makes bigger numbers on the test track than any of the others, if only by a shade. The 5.3-second 0-to-60 squeaked ahead of the Honda by 0.1 second and out front of the Nissan by twice that. The quarter-mile blurs past in 14 seconds flat, again 0.1 second ahead of the Honda, and this time, 0.3 up on the 350Z. All three clock an identical 99 mph in the distance. The BMW leads in top speed at 152 mph, with the Nissan and Porsche close behind at 148. The governed Audi hangs back at 125 mph.
Same story on the skidpad, where the BMW and the Honda tie at 0.92 g, a mere 0.01 behind the Porsche and 0.04 ahead of the Nissan.
(This is an excerpt of an article by Car and Driver in 03 comparing the Z4, 350z, Audi TT, Porsche Boxster, and Honda S2000)
sorry to nitpick but...
It doesn't have a v6, its an Inline.... you sound like my girlfriend saying my civic has a v4
For a fair performance comparison, the $8K more expensive version of the Z4 was used since it was the one most competitive with the S2K in terms of 1/4 mile times and such. Had the comparison involved only price, then the Z4 Base could have be used. However, at that point the S2K pretty much walks away from the Z4 Base in terms of performance. The midlevel Z4 had to be used to compare the performance aspect. When weighing both price and performance (bang for buck) between the two models, you will wind up paying a lot more for a Z4 as to a comparible S2K.
Depending on the price you're willing to pay.
Hope that helps to clear some of the fog.
I was being a smartass and taking his argument points literally just to fuk with him..
and.....of course the Bimmer is more costly....It's BMW! Yes, you're paying for the name.
Yes, you're paying for extra shyt, and some people would rather have all the extras.....I personally enjoyed and felt it was worth paying extra for heated seats, satellite radio, sport springs, and all the other things my car came with.....Some ppl might just need the bare minimum.....It's all up to checkbook and preferences....
Very true. Probably why I went with my Mazdaspeed MX-5 Miata when I did. Turbocharged, 6-speed, LSD, 6-Disk CD Changer, easy to work on, and under $20K brand new.I was being a smartass and taking his argument points literally just to fuk with him..
and.....of course the Bimmer is more costly....It's BMW! Yes, you're paying for the name.
Yes, you're paying for extra shyt, and some people would rather have all the extras.....I personally enjoyed and felt it was worth paying extra for heated seats, satellite radio, sport springs, and all the other things my car came with.....Some ppl might just need the bare minimum.....It's all up to checkbook and preferences....
Hey Chris....the Z4 you're looking at getting....Sport and Premium package?
Just based off of the pics, looks to be just like mine...
Yeah but that doesnt make the regular S2k a BASE model, The CR edition is a different model edition.
Brett (One of the true OG's, No really... ask anyone)
'15 Chevy SS
'16 K7 SXL SWP
www.facebook.com/brett.lowenthal1
R.I.P Leisa, You are never forgotten - 10/7/08
well edmunds used the term BASE MODEL S2000 and TRACK CR EDITION so i just used BASE MODEL to avoid any confusion
I would tend to agree with you though because the CR edition is more money and has no AC no radio, etc.
AN its limited production so almost no one is buying it IMO.
In all reality 98% of S2000 sales will be the "BASE MODEL" which might as well be the only model
Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
-www.usedbarcode.net
I saw one on I-75 the other day going through macon. There was a black guy driving it...
Land Rover LR3 HSE
Make it 91%, add me!! LOL
The Z4 is butt ass ugly, Its heavy, slow, Over rated, a b*tch car and has no back bone in the mountains or really anywhere, and unless you love to suck D*ck, dont buy a Z4.That's rich, and I don't even really like Z4's.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
