So If Your Under 18 On Here.... And Brag You HavenT been Caught

[Brett]

Like whitehart you will be banned like him, Guess I caught ya now huh sucka?

[quickdodge®]

Later, QD.

[Sammich]

i'm under 18...

[Killer]

Like whitehart you will be banned like him, Guess I caught ya now huh sucka?

we need to get a ban for revsk8erdude....

he's only 17... and he's posting in the fs sections...


make it happen old man!

[Sammich]

i'm under 18"

ps lol @ qd's jr high pic

[Sport1.3]

i vote for a ban for all under 21 lol

[DieselNuts]

good thing yall dont know that im only 16......

[BKgen®]

i'm under 18...

so is your sister if i recall correctly... :idb:

[Leadfoot_mf]

i vote for a ban for all under 21 lol

2nd

[Ran]

We should ban for general idiocy rather than age. Whitehart may have been 17, but he wasn't a bad member.

[BKgen®]

2nd

x3

[Brett]

so is your sister if i recall correctly... :idb:

if she is hot, then he can stay!! If his sister is underage and ugly, I will ban him!! LOL

[Killer]

if she is hot, then he can stay!! If his sister is underage and ugly, I will ban him!! LOL

*looks for "O" face of pbs sister.... *





lol that would be so classic...

[quickdodge®]

We should ban for general idiocy rather than age. Whitehart may have been 17, but he wasn't a bad member.

You could always start your own forum with your own rules. Later, QD.

[Hulud]

x3

x4

[Sammich]

so is your sister if i recall correctly... :idb:

quoted for pr00f that u have never seen my sister

[Brett]

We should ban for general idiocy rather than age. Whitehart may have been 17, but he wasn't a bad member.

Rules are rules, We let one we have to let them all, and he also bragged we didnt catch that he was 17, that makes it good enough reason for me

[Sammich]

if she is hot, then he can stay!! If his sister is underage and ugly, I will ban him!! LOL

I KEEL J00 THEN DRIVE UR S2GAY IN THE RIVER

[Hulud]

i know someone who is under 18.... it may cause a lil drama to ban them......

[Ran]

You could always start your own forum with your own rules. Later, QD.

Same goes for you QD. I'll obey by the rules set by IA just like any other member, but that doesn't mean I'll always agree with them. I think I have the privilege to express as such.

[quickdodge®]

Same goes for you QD.

Same what goes for me? It's always you and the same other people that complain every time a rule is enforced. You've never seen me complain at all. You made no sense. Again. Later, QD.

[Hulud]

Same what goes for me? It's always you and the same other people that complain every time a rule is enforced. You've never seen me complain at all. You made no sense. Again. Later, QD.

FRAGMENT!!!!! lol

[quickdodge®]

FRAGMENT!!!!! lol

Fragment these nuts, homeless. Lolol. Later, QD.

[Ran]

You've never seen me complain at all.

The RLD is the first example that comes to mind. You've spoken your words about how you think the site should be cleaned or ran, so let me speak mine.

Also, where have I complained about the rules aside from the stupid pedobear thing that Mr.KiDD tried to pass?

[Killer]

back on topic...

BRETT BAN REVSK8ERDUDE!!!!

DO IT!

[BKgen®]

penis.

[quickdodge®]

The RLD is the first example that comes to mind. You've spoken your words about how you think the site should be cleaned or ran, so let me speak mine.

Maybe you should change your mind, then. As I seem to do so often, I will proceed to prove someone wrong. I've always agreed with the the removal of RLD. I've always laughed at the people that pitch temper tantrums when the RLD is talked about being removed. I've always backed up the idea/thought that the RLD should be removed to make the site more tasteful. I've never said anything to the contrary. Sorry.

Also, where have I complained about the rules aside from the stupid pedobear thing that Mr.KiDD tried to pass?

As cheap a cop out as it seems from me, I'm not fixing to look for examples. I've seen the same people go in and out of threads saying that's stupid or why have this rule or whatever. Later, QD.

[Hulud]

Fragment these nuts, homeless. Lolol. Later, QD.

homeless? lol

i have a place to live

[Ran]

Maybe you should change your mind, then. As I seem to do so often, I will proceed to prove someone wrong. I've always agreed with the the removal of RLD. I've always laughed at the people that pitch temper tantrums when the RLD is talked about being removed. I've always backed up the idea/thought that the RLD should be removed to make the site more tasteful. I've never said anything to the contrary. Sorry.

That's fine that you seek to reinforce your stance so often, but I usually won't do so unless actually prompted for discussion. Such as with the PB issue. I never knocked you for wanting the RLD to go down, since I really don't care either way. I also never said that you contradicted yourself in any fashion. I'm not sure where you're going with this.

As cheap a cop out as it seems from me, I'm not fixing to look for examples. I've seen the same people go in and out of threads saying that's stupid or why have this rule or whatever. Later, QD.

You may have seen a lot of members complain about rules, but I'm not one of them. I don't care about the RLD, I supported the language censorship, and I agree with the requirements to sell on IA. Just because I post with the regular bunch, doesn't necessarily mean that I share their sentiments.

As for this issue, I see no reason for wanting to ban those under 18. IA isn't an adult oriented website. There are car guys who are 16-17 that are twice as intelligent as some of the members we have that are 20+. I'm all for judging on content, rather than age.

[Hulud]

hey b*tches, quit bickering and get back on topic

[quickdodge®]

I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Likewise when you said "same for you." Later, QD.

[Ran]

Likewise when you said "same for you." Later, QD.

I was referring to how you've spoken about your disagreeances with things on IA as well. You could always make your own car forum without the RLD.

hey b*tches, quit bickering and get back on topic

We're still on topic...kinda.

[ShooterMcGavin]

We should ban for general idiocy rather than age. Whitehart may have been 17, but he wasn't a bad member.

bragging that you're underage on IA and haven't been caught falls into the general idiocy category in my book

[quickdodge®]

I was referring to how you've spoken about your disagreeances with things on IA as well. You could always make your own car forum without the RLD.

You're still lost or you didn't really understand what I typed above. Your English is good, isn't it? I said I agreed with the changes. A-G-R-E-E-D. Without the "dis" in front of it. How is being all for a rule being against it? You're reaching for something that isn't there. Just leave it alone. Later, QD.

[Jaimecbr900]

Had one the other day that gave himself away when he tried to rescue his butt buddy.......what a tard.

[quickdodge®]

bragging that you're underage on IA and haven't been caught falls into the general idiocy category in my book

Exactly. Not that the case was even open, but if there were any doubt, it has now been removed by The Wagon. Later, QD.

[Ran]

You're still lost or you didn't really understand what I typed above. Your English is good, isn't it? I said I agreed with the changes. A-G-R-E-E-D. Without the "dis" in front of it. How is being all for a rule being against it? You're reaching for something that isn't there. Just leave it alone. Later, QD.

You're not following me at all. Let me break it down in the most specific way possible.

1) I referred to how you openly disagree with the existence of the RLD even though IA still has it.

2) Similarly, I disagree with the "Ban all under 18" stance.

3) We both disagree with certain things on IA.

4) You called me out and told me to "make my own car site" due to my disagreement, and I told you that you could do the same.


Does that help?

[BKgen®]

need a tampon? jeeezus...

[Ran]

need a tampon? jeeezus...

Quit trying to instigate sh*t. lol

[quickdodge®]

You're not following me at all. Let me break it down in the most specific way possible.

1) I referred to how you openly disagree with the existence of the RLD even though IA still has it.

2) Similarly, I disagreed with the "Ban all under 18" stance.

3) We both disagree with certain things on IA.

4) You called me out and told me to "make my own car site" due to my disagreement, and I told you that you could do the same.


Does that help?

It would help if it was completely true. Starting with Number 1, I will tell you I don't care about the RLD if I'm asked. I don't just post up to get rid of it or I think it needs to be gone or anything. AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE (TWICE IN THIS THREAD), I ALWAYS AGREED WHEN IT IS BROUGHT UP THAT IT BE REMOVED. Hopefully the capital letters will help you see it better. Agreeing with a rule is NOT protesting it. Numbers 2 and 3 are correct. And number 4 is off kilter (but not completely wrong) because of Number 1 not being true. Hopefully this will clear the misconception here and that the real mysteries of the world, like UFOs and Bigfoot, can be more focused on. Later, QD.