So If Your Under 18 On Here.... And Brag You HavenT been Caught

[quickdodge®]

We should ban for general idiocy rather than age. Whitehart may have been 17, but he wasn't a bad member.

You could always start your own forum with your own rules. Later, QD.

[Ran]

You could always start your own forum with your own rules. Later, QD.

Same goes for you QD. I'll obey by the rules set by IA just like any other member, but that doesn't mean I'll always agree with them. I think I have the privilege to express as such.

[quickdodge®]

Same goes for you QD.

Same what goes for me? It's always you and the same other people that complain every time a rule is enforced. You've never seen me complain at all. You made no sense. Again. Later, QD.

[Hulud]

Same what goes for me? It's always you and the same other people that complain every time a rule is enforced. You've never seen me complain at all. You made no sense. Again. Later, QD.

FRAGMENT!!!!! lol

[quickdodge®]

FRAGMENT!!!!! lol

Fragment these nuts, homeless. Lolol. Later, QD.

[Hulud]

Fragment these nuts, homeless. Lolol. Later, QD.

homeless? lol

i have a place to live

[Ran]

You've never seen me complain at all.

The RLD is the first example that comes to mind. You've spoken your words about how you think the site should be cleaned or ran, so let me speak mine.

Also, where have I complained about the rules aside from the stupid pedobear thing that Mr.KiDD tried to pass?

[quickdodge®]

The RLD is the first example that comes to mind. You've spoken your words about how you think the site should be cleaned or ran, so let me speak mine.

Maybe you should change your mind, then. As I seem to do so often, I will proceed to prove someone wrong. I've always agreed with the the removal of RLD. I've always laughed at the people that pitch temper tantrums when the RLD is talked about being removed. I've always backed up the idea/thought that the RLD should be removed to make the site more tasteful. I've never said anything to the contrary. Sorry.

Also, where have I complained about the rules aside from the stupid pedobear thing that Mr.KiDD tried to pass?

As cheap a cop out as it seems from me, I'm not fixing to look for examples. I've seen the same people go in and out of threads saying that's stupid or why have this rule or whatever. Later, QD.

[Ran]

Maybe you should change your mind, then. As I seem to do so often, I will proceed to prove someone wrong. I've always agreed with the the removal of RLD. I've always laughed at the people that pitch temper tantrums when the RLD is talked about being removed. I've always backed up the idea/thought that the RLD should be removed to make the site more tasteful. I've never said anything to the contrary. Sorry.

That's fine that you seek to reinforce your stance so often, but I usually won't do so unless actually prompted for discussion. Such as with the PB issue. I never knocked you for wanting the RLD to go down, since I really don't care either way. I also never said that you contradicted yourself in any fashion. I'm not sure where you're going with this.

As cheap a cop out as it seems from me, I'm not fixing to look for examples. I've seen the same people go in and out of threads saying that's stupid or why have this rule or whatever. Later, QD.

You may have seen a lot of members complain about rules, but I'm not one of them. I don't care about the RLD, I supported the language censorship, and I agree with the requirements to sell on IA. Just because I post with the regular bunch, doesn't necessarily mean that I share their sentiments.

As for this issue, I see no reason for wanting to ban those under 18. IA isn't an adult oriented website. There are car guys who are 16-17 that are twice as intelligent as some of the members we have that are 20+. I'm all for judging on content, rather than age.

[quickdodge®]

I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Likewise when you said "same for you." Later, QD.