nah after 5 years you dont recharge them. but you just mostly throw them away. except for the panasonic plasma's. Granted they have a better contrast capability.. again i say that as their dynamic is high but their native is low. With gases heating/igniting alot of times the gases cant cool down fast enough to go from a bright scene one minute to a dark one the next. and yes most of us would never catch this as we'd have to be paying very detailed attention.. but its there. Also image burn is still an issue with plasma's and the reflective glass front i know is a turn off for many buyers having seen them say so myself. Also the 1080p plasmas are around quite a bit. panasonic has them from 42 to 58". but beware of the hitachi hd 1080 sets.. their false advertising.. They dony have a true 1080p resolution.. their at 1280x1080.. what bitches.Originally Posted by SPOOLIN
if its gonna be a plasma only get ap ana. longer lasting. lower power consumption and lowest heat output of any flat panel period.
whoever heard samsung is at the topwell.. see the problem here is
sony paid 80% of the factory costs.. samsung "owns" and operates it. as part of the agreement they would share some technology.. so now samsung uses the WCG-CCFL panel's also.. but again the bravia processor is the best one out there.
If anyones familiar with crt tv's.. trinitron.. nuff said.. the WEGA engine and BRAVIA engine have won the most awards WORLDWIDE.. i capd that because lg's only won awards in china.. samsung hasnt won alot in the US. etc.
Also i'll openly admits samsung does advertise their products very well. Their ad division's got some smart cookies. and sony never advertises..
Also whoever is looking for the tv.. if you really can tho wait..
WAIT. lol the xbr4 will be out in july.. and if u dont want a xbr4 in july.. the xbr3 and 2 will drop in price cus the new one will be out..
Actually if i rememeber someone had a 46" xbr3 for sale in the sale section here for 2100 that is a fukin steal man if its still there you should snatch that up.




Reply With Quote