lol
thats almost as bad as the rotary GT-R mustang with pistons.
lol
thats almost as bad as the rotary GT-R mustang with pistons.
yeah man, i feel for you bro
used to own a 94 240
have 3 friends all own 240s
came from a small town in PA, were our cars were considered "The fast cars"
all were drifters, had a track made on my buddys farm, small banked oval with a x in the middle
Moved to ATL with the excitement about seeing a 240 and being like oh man wonder who all dirfts?!
come to find out... 240s are everywhere... 98% of people say they can drift... 95% of those people lie
ATL, you have broken my heart![]()
whaddayamean drift?
HAHAHA um, ok... lets take your bone stock 1989-1997 240 and, hmm, lets say a gto, or a vette, or hell even a camaro, take it to road atlanta, and see who pulls better lap times... want more variety? lets take a mustang gt, or hell, just take your pick. now, mod for mod? yes 240s can be fairly stout. but stock for stock, hell no.Originally Posted by koukis14
*edit: yeah, sorry, didnt feel like reading everything... this just made me lol
Originally Posted by JDMmuscle
thats y u need a real car like a RX-7 or celica![]()
lol, boost that NA...........BOOM!!!
what happened,apex seals blew,lol
Your point is HALFWAY decent except for the fact that your comparing 140 HP cars to 300HP cars and a shitload of other variables. You cant tell me (with a traight face) that you think your GTO can outhandle a 240 in a curveOriginally Posted by collins
LOL at you if you think that
Add enough power to a 240 to balance the Power/Weight ratio and itll turn laps quicker than any of the cars you mention minus the vette
Horsepower doesnt equal good lap times![]()
FUCK B&D COMMUNICATIONS!
lol,i bet a stock 160hp FC could tear up a 240 on the track
fixedOriginally Posted by Echonova
![]()
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
*sigh*Originally Posted by quickdodge®
You seriously need to give up retarded, half witted insults. If you're not going to give up posting on IA, at least give up your idiotic attempts at degrading me.
lets stay on topic shall we?
GO WITH THE IS300.
Originally Posted by Steveo
correct me if i'm wrong here, but in my original quotation, it was said that 240's come equipped with better suspension than the NEW AMERICAN SPORTS CARS.... so tell me, what do you think new american sports cars consist of? also talking stock for stock... of course you can modify one to destroy american muscle in the twisties, but that wasnt the variable... you said factory, and i gave you my rebuttal.
discuss...
240s are nice little sporty cars. end discussion lol.
FC > 240
/thread
i agree the turbo 2 is, but NA, puhhhleaseee that thing is slower than molasses on a cold winters day.
nah,N/A u still had more HP than a 240 with less weight and better handling and no redline
i was in the car when a 1993 DOHC 240 destroyed a 1988 FC. I dont see where your getting your info from. BIAS!!! BIAS!!! TurboII FC > 240 > FC > Honda
Lateral G's
89 240sx = .88
GTO = .86
They both are shitty from the factory, end of discussion.
Thats not bad for 1989.Originally Posted by TheSnail
let me fix that for you.Originally Posted by JJ Alfano
and for the record a 89 FC pulls a .91g
and i dont know what RX-7 u raced,but i never met a civic round here that could keep up with my 7 over 60mph
does that mean,their arnt civic that could beat my 7,of course theirs better one,but i never raced them,and i ran out on country roads,not in the city
i still think...
Price wise, 240 gives you the absolute most bang for your buck
rear wheel drive, nice ride handling, decent HP
all for maybe 5 grand for a super clean one?
Come on nothing compairs
sure you can get a rx7, and Obviously the turbo one will be faster
but compair
non turbo FC
non turbo 240,
240 is WAY more reliable, cost less to keep up, better full mileage
i think one of the factors that 240s went skyrocketing in numbers is people see that its a rear wheel drive platform, that has a HUGE aftermarket support, all for a cheap price
i really think if a car company came out with a new rear wheel drive platform for around 10k , they could REALLY milk the market
It is good to see more and more car companies going back to rear drive. The new Dodge/300M the new GMs are switching to rear drive for thier bigger cars with the Holden platform. The Saturn Sky/Pontiac Solstice(sp) Ford with the...............um..............hhhmmmmm.......Originally Posted by JDMmuscle
well the sky is completing with the miata and Z4...and now everyone had decided to jump BMWs case...idk y?
how can u compare a impala to a 540????
240s are drift rice. its all about the Hachi bro.
Bahahahahaha!Originally Posted by TheSnail
Voya FTW!
--RIP Leisa. Forever In Our Hearts--
--Val for President 1979-2007--
--RIP Val, You will be missed--
Originally Posted by HalfBaked
haha in no way, shape, or form do i disagree with you!Originally Posted by TheSnail
240's suck, get anything else