Originally Posted by itsjustdee
thanks for the negative reps man! I appreciate it!
too bad i have gotten alot more positive reps than negative reps in this thread. Better luck next time.
Originally Posted by itsjustdee
thanks for the negative reps man! I appreciate it!
too bad i have gotten alot more positive reps than negative reps in this thread. Better luck next time.
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
Too bad for you. I'm white & rich and I'm lovin life. Poor non-white bastard!Originally Posted by Brett
Originally Posted by CRAZY_JAY
I was leaving my neighborhood and floored it once i got on the road and it was for a second and wasnt even going speed limit. I dont gun it in my neighborhood too many kids around there
your maturity is shining throughOriginally Posted by itsjustdee
damaging private property - that would be a good call on your part
2005 Ford F-150 FX4 Supercrew
VIOLATION!!! Punching someone in the face is fine but, messing with the ride is way out of bounds! Just by stating that, you have broken one of the very first Man Laws. This is a very sad day in history folksOriginally Posted by itsjustdee
![]()
Lol when people cut me off, I ride on there ass hard...well guess I shouldn't do it to you...
Very true, just like I had an arguement today about SRT-4's with Ch@dbee. Don't hate all of them, and don't group anything. You can't group anything in life cause everyone is different and just because a few people who are rich are fucking pricks. So I guess what I'm saying is, you can't put people into groups because everyone is an individual. Get to know before you judge and your mind and IQ will rise...and everyone has something to learn....Originally Posted by Lucky SC
high fiveOriginally Posted by JDM onlyy
![]()
2005 Ford F-150 FX4 Supercrew
lolOriginally Posted by EvasiveEF9
![]()
I would have shot the thread starter anyway. You getting out and yelling would stand up in court just fine. Your a fucking idiot and would be dead so how the fuck would "YOU" sue me? please explain.
Lets look here:
First you stop in front blocking me from continuing on my way. You then get out and walk over to my car yelling. I am automatically going to assume that you are about to attempt to harm me and I am going to react on my gut instinct and that is to fight back. I am either going to shoot you or run your ass over, which ever way seems fast enough to get me out of harms way.
A witness see's you get out of your car and walk over to my car ranting. I don't know too much about court shit but I know they will take it as you had road rage and had intent on cause harm. I would have reacted on self defense and plead that as well, I would have felt bad for killing you but better you than me.
No Homo.
Haha, I just read this whole thread.
The thread starter is a moron, and you would've been shot in a defensive manner for litigation purposes had it have been my mom and I was riding shotgun. Well, I would've just held you there until the police came and you told your story to them.
itsjustdee, I don't even know where to begin with you...I'm speechless.
That is all.
Originally Posted by jerseyef9
...and that's why the last two posters would probably be in jail with me, if I was alive.
Next time, to prevent people saying they'd have shot me, I'll just slam on the brakes when I'm on I75, and hold you up from getting to work on time. You'll still wanna shoot me since you may get fired...
...BUT AT LEAST I WON'T BE CHARGED WITH AGGRESSIVE DRIVING!![]()
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
Wait...what the fuck am I even argueing for?
When the hell did I ever ask anyone's opinion on "Should I NOT have done this?"
WTF...it was a rant made for entertainment, and to vent on my hatred for dickheads on the road...rich or poor. Yes, it seemed aimed at the wealthier class, I realize that. But what the hell...it was meant for entertainment and venting. Keep your opinions. If you don't laugh...don't post.
Then again...what else would I have expected from IA...
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
Sucks to here about your day. In all honesty though what you did was stupid. One, you couldve been shot. I know that sounds dumb but you never know. Two, if someone wouldve reported what happened to the police and gotten your tag number, you couldve gotten in some shit. Not trying to be rude or anything.. Just making a comment. Hope everything turned out better for you.Originally Posted by EvasiveEF9
B.T.W. I didnt read anything but the first page, so im sure someone has flamed you already. Thats not my intentions in anyway.
LoL, I've been flamed and put on high...Originally Posted by LS2ner
Thanks for posting a non-bastardly but opinionated post.Reps will be given if I can.
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
Originally Posted by EvasiveEF9
No prob man. Ive been tempted to do what you did alot, but only followed through maybe twice. I usually keep my cool pretty well. Anyways, fuck rich ass, none able to drive, ignorant, stuck up bitches.
Ya know, speaking of rich people who cant drive, i think i saw the most saddening thing ever the other day. On my way back to my girlfriends, a black s2k turned in front of me. Well in the middle of his turn i hear him grind the gears like crazy followed by him almost stalling the car. Once he got going, i noticed that everytime he changed gears that the car jerked. So i assume he couldnt shift very well. This doesnt that bad, but the s2k was so hot... OEM lip kit/body kit, Black rims that looked ALOT like Volk SF-Challenges, and a decent sounding exhaust. I thought that maybe it was his sons car or something, but the guy was trying to show off. He'd speed up in straight aways then slow WAY down in turns. Now im in my 07 Frontier so its obvious im not trying to race him, but he kept turning around and looking at me and smiling. I ended just laughing it off cause he almost wrecked after looking back when entering a turn. Anyways.. rant over..
Originally Posted by EvasiveEF9
rofl great point. then you would only be charged with: assault with a deadly weapon, reckless driving, public endangerment, attempted murder (if ur really lucky), and intentional/attempted manslaughter/ murder if someone was hurt/killed. Sounds like a great alternative to stoping the little lady in her subdivision.![]()
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
Dude...I swear there was something in the road. I gave proper spacing to not hit the vehicle in front of me and was trying to prevent hitting whatever was in the road in front of me. The lady behind me, on the other hand, apparently did NOT.Originally Posted by Danny
![]()
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
funny. but hate to say ur ass would still be grass. somthing in the road or not.Originally Posted by EvasiveEF9
now if that "something" punctured ur tire and made to deccelerate really fast, then i think u would be oklol
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
After she hit me, I'd quickly run up to the front of the car with a kabar. "WTF, I dont' know, I saw it, but it was too late and it slit the sidewall of my tire. Because my car only weighs 1800lbs, it stopped me rather quickly. There was nothing I could do, your honor..."Originally Posted by Danny
..we MIGHT be thinking too far into this.
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
maybe. lolOriginally Posted by EvasiveEF9
either way, that would be a unethical thing to do.
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
I think just about everything discussed in this thread is unethical...from me getting out of my car, to her riding my ass..Originally Posted by Danny
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
Originally Posted by MeanGreen
Just to clarify...You cannot just shoot and kill someone because you feel they have intentions of harming you. If they follow you into your home then yes or maybe if they were firing a weapon at you. Because someone is walking to your car yelling doesnt justify shooting them with intentions of killing them. You have other options i.e. ; Lock your doors, drive around them, reverse away, etc... If they presented a bat or a gun then shooting them in the leg/arm could possibly be justified, but murder wouldnt. Not intending to flame...just saying.
Joker, the lady sense you were a owner of a EF with Z-3 fenders LOL J/K
totallyOriginally Posted by bigdare23
...I was in the talon![]()
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
you were doing good up intill the whole shoot them in the leg thing. You have watched to many movies.Originally Posted by LS2ner
_________________
But basically it comes down to you just cant go shooting people because you feel threated, and if you think you can, you have been misinformed/ you are stupid.
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
negative sir...Without a doubt i could hit someone in the leg/arm/shoulder. I wasnt meaning only legs or arm... just making a broad and vague example.
Only problem with not KILLING them with a shot is that then they can sue for...what is it...uncontrolled firearm, or something like that? IF I shoot...it's to kill. One shot. One kill.
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
im just saying most military and law enforcment agencies dont teach that idealology because they know its unrealistic.Originally Posted by LS2ner
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
...we're taught shoot-to-kill. One-shot one-kill in the heart...
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
so you either pick up chicks on the road or cut them off and threaten them... fo realz- RRFTW!!! roadrageforthewin!
i<3u
LoL, and get threatened by sheriffs. But YOU were HARD to hunt down!Originally Posted by brittoknee
JDMadness ==>EvasiveEF9
Yes you can, and if the intent can be proven it's called justifiable homicide.Originally Posted by LS2ner
Absolutely you can.Because someone is walking to your car yelling doesnt justify shooting them with intentions of killing them. You have other options i.e. ; Lock your doors, drive around them, reverse away, etc...
In the state of Georgia as of last year you have every right to "stand your ground" and defend yourself. You no longer HAVE to retreat first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law
The state of Florida in the United States became the first to enact such a law on October 1, 2005. The Florida statute allows the use of deadly force when a person reasonably believes it necessary to prevent the commission of a "forcible felony." Under the statute, forcible felonies include "treason; murder; manslaughter; sexual battery; carjacking; home-invasion robbery; robbery; burglary; arson; kidnapping; aggravated assault; aggravated battery; aggravated stalking; aircraft piracy; unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and any other felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any individual."[1]
The Florida law authorizes the use of defensive force by anyone "who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be." Furthermore, under the law, such a person "has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony." The statute also grants civil and criminal immunity to anyone found to have had such a reasonable belief.[1]
I highlighted the parts that would and could possibly apply to your "jumping out and running up to someone yelling". If you jump out of your car and come at me, I will without remorse testify that I was "in fear for my life" and I did what I had to protect myself.
Robocop, you watch too many movies and I hope you don't depend on a gun to protect yourself with that mentality.If they presented a bat or a gun then shooting them in the leg/arm could possibly be justified, but murder wouldnt. Not intending to flame...just saying.![]()
If you pull the trigger, you should intend to do one thing and one thing only. If you want to spend it trying to aim at their knees or their shoulders, be my guest. I will put two in the chest and one in the head myself.