Quote Originally Posted by .blank cd View Post
Fact. I asked for more information. I don't understand how you're disputing that because I asked it. "I want more info" is not anywhere close to an opinion by any stretch of the English language, and to continue to claim it is an opinion is either a poor troll or English isn't your first or second language. I wouldn't argue that any further because you're just trolling yourself at this point. Case closed on that.

Fact. Koch brothers are conservative lobbyists, and they donated to the Fraser Institute. I don't know why you're disputing this either, because you said it yourself, and there's plenty of evidence Ive already quoted that supports this. This isnt up for debate at all, because no one disputes this at all. You lost that one too. I wouldn't argue this any further because you'll just be arguing with and against yourself, unless you're prefacing any subsequent arguments with "I indeed don't understand English...". Case closed on that one too.
I need more information is not a "fact", there is no actual existence of anything such as quantifiable data there. It's a statement that you are using to not accept the facts in front of you. (Oh, and that is an opinion.)

I never disputed that Koch Industries donated - I was the one that specifically stated that from the start, so that you wouldn't try to claim it later as being a hidden agenda (we have seen that behavior before).
You initially rejected this report based upon the donation of money from Koch Industries to Fraser Institute, and you immediately assumed that it was related to this study. You keep saying that they are conservative, and that is the only reason that you give for this item, but then in another thread, you claim that Obama is right of center (which is conservative), and that you are conservative on issues as well. Why would Koch Industries founders be an issue for you then, since I have shown that there is no correlation between the donations and the results of the study?