The conclusion was that Canada's system was unsustainable with its current model, which started in 1984. That means that it is starting to run into issues in less than 30 years. Does that sound like a system that the US should tout as a shining example of what the US government should do for its citizens? What happens when Canada no longer has the financial capability to sustain its current health system?Originally Posted by .blank cd
"I just would like to see someone else back up an opinion that goes against mainstream research." - YOU, today.
Where is this mainstream research? Fraser Institute actually is the mainstream and is ranked in the top 30 think tanks in the world. You can't get much more mainstream than them.
"...an opinion financed by lobbyists" - YOU, today.
This is certainly your opinion, but only your opinion. No other learned organization or individual have the same opinion though - just you.
Fraser's financials are pretty open, and I showed them earlier. Their positions on donations is clear also, and well known. The donations they receive are unrestricted and come only from private foundations, organizations, or individuals. This just isn't working out for you, is it?
"If their numbers are accurate, then somewhere else there are another set of accurate numbers." - YOU, today.
I don't even have to say anything here. You claimed it. ^^ See Above. "Havent made a claim or belief yet. Done" - YOU, now
First you had reading comprehension issues, now you have memory problems as well. You should see a doctor.
That's because you have none that you can name that have addressed the issue. You have no basis for your statements other than your own personal opinion, which is fine, but it does not match to the facts and data.
You have not presented any facts or data to refute anything posted today. Nothing.
Reply With Quote