
Originally Posted by
Sinfix_15
I reluctantly agree that drug testing isnt a realistic proposal and wouldnt accomplish much anyways. It just sucks having no control over what the government does with your money. The government isnt capable of enforcing the type of regulations that SHOULD be in place, which is exactly why they should start shrinking their programs. Everything the government controls is expensive, ineffective and poorly ran, yet they want to control and run everything. If i go spend my money to have my car painted, i can select the shop that i feel will do the best job for the right price. With the government, we're forced to pay top dollar for the shittiest service in town and we have no choice in the matter. If the welfare program doesnt have the staff or resources to assist people with finding jobs, train them for said jobs and regulate reasonable restrictions for welfare applicants, then there shouldnt be a welfare system. We need less government programs across the board. Certain things need to be ran by people who are more invested in the results.........
We're sitting here having a conversation about whether or not it's constitutional to drug test someone who is having the government pay for their living.... how about asking if it's constitutional for me to be forced to buy into these flawed and failing government programs?