Those arent policies, and he hasnt done anything to help any of them. Saving GM ...........if you mean spending 80 billion to save a company that was tanking because of horrible business deals and shitty products, and they still owe us, then i dont know if i count that as a positive.
So you must be for the bank bailouts then right?
I mean if youre for bailing out companies at least be consistent.
Housing market isnt recovering, its better for sure, but forclosures actually accelerated this year. I dont know what makes you think the market is ok. I know people in real estate that will strongly disagree with you.
I totally have no clue what you are saying. Dumb it down for me. Romney has never advocated for taking anyones social welfare away?4) He has explained what he will with the money coming in. You know this.
What Romney doesn't understand is that those people that will lose welfare, foodstamps, healthcare, etc... will not go away. They will still be out there. What do you think is going to happen?
It'll be more expensive then since we'll have to start building jails and start imprisoning people. lol
He hasnt not said what the extra revenue will go to. He has mentioned paying down the deficit, but we accumulate close to 400 billion in interest a year alone. So please save me the 100 billion makes a dent in the deficit argument.
Explain to me how the extra 100 billion helps middle class or poor people. Again, if its ONLY 100 billion standing between us an economic prosperity, why doesnt he just SPEND THE 100 billion?





Reply With Quote
