Quote Originally Posted by JDM onlyy View Post
Problem with this is, the guy didn't blow up the building screaming, "For JESUS!!!!!" None of the people who were Christians claimed they did it in the name of Christianity. (I'm not Christian, I'm just stating an obvious fact) Whereas, the terrorists that were Muslim stated they were doing in the name of Islam and Allah. Get what I'm saying?
I can understand that, but we cannot hold an entire religion accountable for the actions of a few individuals.

Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy View Post
I do hold the muslim religion as a major contributor to the attacks on 9/11 as I do with just about every other terrorist attack over the last 3 decades.

No you arent because there has been plenty of reasons that people are against this site and you simply ignore them and change the subject. You, and those like you, say anyone that doesnt want it there is a racist/biggot/whatever else. I am friends with a couple of muslims, one of them very devout, and they are perfectly ok with my beliefs. I dont trust muslims as a whole and probably never will. They have earned that mistrust and until they do something to earn trust back I will continue about my ways with no problems.
That has to be the most idiotic statement I have seen. I can only imagine that you do that same in all aspect of your beliefs, you take the actions of a few and hold and entire group accountable, yet you didn't seem to have the stance when discussing the Tea Party Movement and the racist signs. You claimed that the few people who had the racist signs were not representative of the Tea Party, yet you won't grant Islam the same latitude.

Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy View Post
Because I dont care to. I have seen what I need to see from the muslim religion. Not every muslim is a terrorist but a high enough percentage of them are, or at least sympathize with them that I do not trust them.
What empirical evidence do you have to support that claim? Or is it yet another biased assumption?