Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Once again.....AND????

You obviously don't want to talk about content and want to get stuck on meaningless details. Ok, I'll play along. Have you thought about the fact that many plumbers are allowed to work for a COMPANY and thereby noone requires the individual plumber to have a "license"??? How about all the DJ's in every radio station? Do you think each individual one of them are FCC licensed? Does that make them any less a DJ? How about RE agents that work under a Broker? Any less an Agent? I could go on and on. Many professions allow you to legally work under someone else that is licensed w/o any problems what so ever. So where is your argument? Besides, what does any of this have to do with what he SAID?

Talk about grasping at straws.
Personally, I don't care about "Joe the Plumber". Honestly, I have no argument because in his case, the state required the license. That isn't debatable. If the state requires the license, for whatever profession, then it would make that person "unqualified" to operate without it. Like I have said before, arguing over small issues is not what is important. I merely stated a fact about him.

However, I do find it amusing the situation he has put himself in.