I have. I also currently work for a small S corp that certainly falls into the businesses in question.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
I can agree to that to some extent, but let's turn that same situation around. What happens if you reduce the tax load on that same person. Are they going to hire more people? NO. Are they going to invest more in the business or economy? NO. They are going to do the same think you think they are going to do. They are going to "hoard" the extra money that they get to use your own words.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
I really do have a problem with this trickle down supply side of thinking. If it's bad for the big guys, then it's worse for the little guys. The worse it gets for the little guys, the worse they make it for the big guys. If the little guy is paying so much of his income that he can't afford to pay bills, he isn't going out to buy pepsi. That is why pepsi is doing poorly in the first place. If you raise the taxes on the people that CAN afford to still pay their bills, they don't go hungry. They don't stop enjoying their lifestyle. They just don't keep getting richer as quickly. PLEASE, stop assuming that if we give breaks to the big guys, they will pass on the benifits to the small guys. It has never happened, and never will.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Nobody is talking about giving the tax money from the rich to the poor here. That is a very unfair assumption. We don't have enough money coming into the government to pay for roads, public education. Hell, we don't even make enough to pay the interest only on our national debt, much less pay anything down. This is not weath redistribution. This is a simple fact that we have spent more than we have and now somebody has to pay the bill. There is only one side that has enough money to pay the bill, so guess who gets stuck with it? Is it fair? NO. Is there another way. No again.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Now I would have to ask you...have you ever bought, owned, or started your own business? I don't know where you got the statistical numbers on this one, but EVERYONE I know who has ever started or bought their own business did so with the intention of selling that business for a profit. Are there some family owned businesses that are trying to create a legacy for their children? Sure. Are they the majority? Absolutely not, much more so the minority. That was the entire Dot Com model. Produce a great product from startup and sell as soon as the company had potential to turn a great profit and keep going. Many small businesses are traded just like stocks.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Again, I have been in this boat, so won't really address this one.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
To be completly honest, I agree with almost all aspects of the Fair Tax proposals. The one thing that does worry me is that with America's obsession with spending more than their means(being in credit), that the tax itself will make things less affordable simply because they will be paying finance charges on so many taxes that they aren't now. It doesn't change the revenue standpoint, but might not be so easy to handle economically for your average taxpayer. That can certainly be attributed to the stupidity of our culture, but I will leave that for another day.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
The feeling is quite mutual sometimes ;-)Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900





Reply With Quote