Quote Originally Posted by rrutter81
http://www.daviesand.com/Choices/Pre...ook/index.html

i like more non-biased/alarmist approaches. Notice... more co2 doesnt always = more temperature if we were to use these linear graphs. think even al gore used one of these.
Yeah, but the graph of temperature's peaks grow consistently higher every other year, and the temp peaks are almost always congruous to the graph of the carbon levels. Also:

Quote Originally Posted by article you posted... bottom of page
As Wallace Broecker likes to say, the Earth's climate system is "an angry beast" and one that we should not be poking with sticks, which of course is exactly what we are doing with all our carbon dioxide and other GTG emissions. We don't know exactly when or how "the beast" will react, but we do know that it eventually will. It's not a matter of whether, it's only a matter of when and how. Those of us who live in geographcal regions affected by the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation should be especially aware of how sensitive this part of "the beast's" anatomy is to poking and prodding.