How many of you.....

[Total_Blender]

yes but if you look closer.... the temp changes first, and then co2 content catches up.
)

The Co2 (red line) is a constantly rising curve. It doesn't have the peaks and valleys like the temp chart. The C02 level never really drops significantly in any of the graphs.

[rrutter81]

The Co2 (red line) is a constantly rising curve. It doesn't have the peaks and valleys like the temp chart. The C02 level never really drops significantly in any of the graphs.

wait im confused.

are you worred about too much co2 suffocating us to death? or the correlation of co2 and temperature?

all im saying is co2 lags behind the temperature change. First the temp changes... then co2 in the atmosphere goes up. Anything after 1800 is obviously humans screwing with the co2 content, but the temperature is not matching.

[BanginJimmy]

Anything after 1800 is obviously humans screwing with the co2 content.

why do you say this? Maybe it has more to do With global populations than it does with human generated wastes? Starting in the Mid 1800's global population has grown at an alarming pace. Only in the last 20 years has population growth diminished among industrialized nations. Only 3rd worth counties have not shown dramatic declines in population growth rate.

[rrutter81]

why do you say this? Maybe it has more to do With global populations than it does with human generated wastes? Starting in the Mid 1800's global population has grown at an alarming pace. Only in the last 20 years has population growth diminished among industrialized nations. Only 3rd worth counties have not shown dramatic declines in population growth rate.

could be right, i dont know.