Since many people are *****'n about Obama raising taxes for that tax bracket, I was just wondering how many people on IA does this effect directly.
Yes
No
 Do you make atleast $250k
 Do you make atleast $250k
				Since many people are *****'n about Obama raising taxes for that tax bracket, I was just wondering how many people on IA does this effect directly.
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				lol this will be interesting...
 
 
				LOLOriginally Posted by Sammich
sucks for joe the plumber
Versus
 
 
				I make close to that.......not reall, but in a couple years, lol.
This thread is going to get good, at least I hope. I NEED DRAMA!
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				what the hell do you plan on doing? lolOriginally Posted by AirMax95
na my wife and i make close to that but i'm hoping maybe in the next ten years we can open up our own DRUG DEALING business
 
 
				I work hard; not saying I will hit it but I plan to get damn close. I have a few plans up my sleeves. It does involve sales, but not drugs, lol.Originally Posted by admin
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				lol why drugs is where its at... i told my wife years ago we should of done an online pharmacy...Originally Posted by AirMax95
"enlarge your wang! - viagra 5$"
my wife and i have talked about opening up and independent pharmacy or buying into one. there is quite a bit of money in them. the one she works at now probably does around 1.2-1.5 mil a year
 
 
				Originally Posted by admin
I know there is! I don't have any clue about the pharmaceuticals, nor do my business contacts, lol. Also, i thought you were hinting at that Blue Magic
Good luck with that. Hopefully though, our ideas will sell like crack
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				Originally Posted by admin
than you will still be okay cause you wont file for taxes
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				Everyone else is having to tighten up, how about no tax increases for anyone? Maybe the Governmet needs to tighten its belt as well, maybe even do some pay cuts/ demotions.
Lol, wtf am I thinking.
^^^^I work with education, I can get them started young....
That was wrong.
 
 
				Hopefully, I'll be getting taxed out the ass in a few years... LOL
 
 
				shoulda made it a public poll!
My answer = NO!
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				don't worry i can post up peoples answers laterOriginally Posted by Kevykev

 
 
				Originally Posted by Kevykev

I wanted to, but I didnt want to invade anyone privacy
 
 
				LOL. Kidd? Kayfunk? Jaime? How about you, RedGT? OH WAIT... RedGT's daddy does.
my answer is a FIRM no... lol
 
 
				Originally Posted by osnap
And you're point would be? Considering my dad used to make less than 10% of that.......
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
 
 
				the ammount is actually a house hold income of $117k a year
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				if you lose your job over PERSONAL taxes to your boss then obviously you don't work for a stable company to begin with. his personal money shouldn't interfere w/ the business unless he is wanting to invest moreOriginally Posted by cb7
 
 
				Paul you do realize that ceritan companies such as s-corps are taxed based on the personal income scale right?Originally Posted by admin
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				No, not yet.
 
 
				Even if he didn't I still don't agree with it in principle.
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
 
 
				Its really more the principle of the matter than it is the direct effect. I believe there should be a set percentage tax rate. That way everyone gets taxed the same. Imagine yourself spending 11 years in college and becoming a neurosurgeon. When you get out and have a job, you're going to make A LOT of money. Money that you spent long hours and hard work earning. Why should you be punished for all your hard work, and the good deeds you are doing, by being taxed more than everyone else.
Most people with money dont have a problem helping the needy. Instead of taxing them and giving it to every tom **** and harry who apply for food stamps and welfare, they could donate to charities that help children in foster homes and those with disabilities. Of course not everyone with money is going to "be a good person" like that. But lets stop trying to play Robin Hood and just rely on the ones who will, because believe it or not, there are a lot more people who will than won't.
Thats my 2 cents...
**Original photo by CF Photography**
 
 
				As if the malpractice insurance and school loans aren't enough. Also the sad thing about the welfare issue was seeing a lady pay with food stamps and get in a 335i and all those people on WIC w/ nice cars.originally posted by amped4life33
Its really more the principle of the matter than it is the direct effect. I believe there should be a set percentage tax rate. That way everyone gets taxed the same. Imagine yourself spending 11 years in college and becoming a neurosurgeon. When you get out and have a job, you're going to make A LOT of money. Money that you spent long hours and hard work earning. Why should you be punished for all your hard work, and the good deeds you are doing, by being taxed more than everyone else.
Instead of taxing them and giving it to every tom **** and harry who apply for food stamps and welfare, they could donate to charities that help children in foster homes and those with disabilities. Of course not everyone with money is going to "be a good person" like that. But lets stop trying to play Robin Hood and just rely on the ones who will, because believe it or not, there are a lot more people who will than won't.
 
 
				Originally Posted by BlkCD5


I couldn't work in a grocery store without laughing at those people everyday.
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				this is true but you can only walk on the backs of the poor for so long... now look at us. w/ years of bush tax cuts our economy is a failure - china/india are going to be the next world super powers. i'm not saying it is totally at fault but such tax cuts were supposed to stimulate the economy and it hasn't. i'm all for way more regulation on social programs but taxes are a need. you can't tax on equal level and think we can sustain a good economy. that is just being naive.Originally Posted by BlkCD5
 
 
				werd
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
 
			
			 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				i do not but my stepfather who pays for my college education so that I can make that kind of money one day makes well over $250,000 a year. So of course i'm going to vote for someone who will not raise my family's taxes!
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				My cousins uncle through wedlockfather's brother twice removed best friend from high school...
Get the point? Just say no, I don't even make that much in 5 years.
 
 
				My question is why defend the rich?!? I promise you they dont give a damn about anything but profit. Seriously, if they could replace every human employee with a robot to increase profit they would. There are few exceptions in every case (just like there are people on welfare that dont cheat the system), but this case they are few and far apart. I see it like this... if you have a problem, fix the root of the problem! Don't put that responsibility in someone hands that may or may not decide to help. That doesn't make sense. Thats like adding too many factors to the equation. You can get 10 by adding 5 and 5, but you can also get 10 by take 5 multiplying it by 45, and taking the square root of that. But why calcute 10 the second way when you has more chances of ****ing up.
 
 
				I would hardly consider someone who made 250K a year rich. Most people who make that much are small business owners. Small businesses are what keep this country's economy from completely going under. Our entire economy depends on small businesses ten times more than large corporations. Why raise taxes on those who are keeping the economy afloat? So you can give it to those who have ****ed up the economy?Originally Posted by bigdare23
If the democrats hadn't pushed HUD through the economy would be in much better shape. HUD (which makes it illegal for mortgage discrimination) has made it where banks must make risky mortgages to people who can't pay it back. These risky mortgage loans are the main reason that the economy is so ****ed up right now. All these large banks are going out of business because of all the bad mortgages they have written and will never get paid back on. Even if the bank repo's houses, the market is so shot to **** right now that they would never be able to sell most of them at a high enough price just to break even, especially with house values in the toilet. Granted, some of the people who got these risky mortgages work hard to pay them back and improve their credit, but the vast majority do not.
Why defend the rich? Because the "rich" keep this country from being a poor third world country.
Land Rover LR3 HSE
 
			
			 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
						 
					
				
			
			 
			
				 
 
				Damn those people for wanting a house. Last time I checked there is still a process of being approved. It's not like just cause you're black you're automatically approved for a $300k mortage.Originally Posted by allmotoronly

Just a sorry interpretation of HUD.. this stuff never ceases to amaze me.
 
 
				Did I ever say the word black? No. There are probably just as many sorry white people who put their mortgage payments last on their list of priorities, right behind that new $50k SUV they are driving, or that $2k flat screen they just bought. People think that just because the government guarantees them a loan, it doesn't matter if they make payments on time and have bad credit. They fall behind on payments, and the bank gets stuck with a house that is worth only 60% of what it was worth 3 years ago... I am aware that there is a process for being approved, but they are approving mortgages for much larger amounts than they would in the past, and they are approving mortgages to people who have super ****ty credit. Loaning money to someone who has bad credit (which means they have obviously had problems with debt in the past) is just not a good idea.Originally Posted by tony
Land Rover LR3 HSE
 
 
				Originally Posted by allmotoronly
Not really, It's the poor minimum wage struggling people that really keep us from going under. Without the average underpaid worker, there wouldn't fast food chain gurus or Walmart just to name a few. Greed is going to be our downfall. Greed is the reason why our economy is in the position we are in now, and these are the people that need tax breaks?!?
 
 
				Man. I always love how people always argue the extremes on each end of the argument. When really in all actuallity one can not prosper without the other. It's a fact that can not be refuted.Originally Posted by bigdare23
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ