
Originally Posted by
shagwAg3n
first off, it's oregon, not oregon state. secondly, more than just those 3 teams have shown flashes of brilliance this season in the pac10 (ucla, washington and washington state have all had their moments).
every yr, one team or another will get "screwed", but the important thing is to have the least amount of teams get screwed. with that said, the bcs is (unfortunately), the best thing for college football. there is NO PERFECT SYSTEM that can be used YEAR AFTER YEAR. based on what you're saying, every yr maybe we should let a different number of teams from the same conference have a shot at competing for the national championship? like maybe the big10 or sec has a great yr and has 3 teams all worthy of it, that shit just won't work and someone will always be pissed at the end of the day.
2 reasons why bcs is better than a playoff? well one, the obvious, is that the regular conf will no longer mean shit to anyone. two, i personally believe it's unfair to ask student athletes, especially around the holidays and finals time, to play 2 or 3 or however many more games to determine a national championship. as much as we love the sport, the ncaa reminds everyone constantly that college sports is NOT the pros, the kids are there to get an education first.