
Originally Posted by
Vteckidd
there have been plenty of those, Tyler hansborough lead the ACC ALL TIME in scoring, has been less than mediocre in the NBA. Christian Laetnet was arguably the best PF in the game, was mediocre in the NBA. Ryan Leaf was a huge bust in the NFL, so was Matt Reinhart.
tebow did great things in college, but everyone knew what they were getting with him in the NFL and his scouting report has proven to be absolutely 100% correct.
Late release=too slow for the NFL. It takes him an extra 1-2 seconds to get rid of the ball, which means defenses who pressure him will keep him from reacting. Did you see any of the passes he threw sunday? he through some wounded ducks out there LOL
Im not saying he cant be succesful, but it means molding an offense around his style of play , which traditionally in the NFL DOESNT WORK (option). Sorry. youre asking a lot for someone to retool their entire offense around 1 player.
John Elway is a pretty great judge of talent, and i dont think you can compare todays league to his era. A QB rating in 1984 isnt the same as 2011. the game is much faster paced now, much more physical, much sloppier, and its TOTALLY a passers game. QBs are way more protected now (by league and refs) than in montana and elways days.
Thats opinion. I dont know what you mean by it. But most teams dont draft based on the "rudy" scale.
I just named them/.............................
I think you meant people that were supposed to suck and then were good? Yeah thats true theres been a ton of those guys. Mediocre players in college and stuff that turned out to be great NFL players (tom Brady, although i wont say he was mediocre in college just was a bust in the nfl for 4-5 years).
Things can change, but brady had normal mechanics. he just needed a shot. tebow doesnt, his mechanics arent setup for the NFL game and its speed. If he can ADJUST then that will be great for him. but so far from whta i have watched, ive seen nothing that shows that