Quote Originally Posted by boosted347 View Post
Wow stereotypical SEC sack rider...i can admit the SEC is hands down the toughest conference in college football but to compare boise with the generic argument of "o they would only win this many and lose all these if they were in the SEC" this is the stupidest argument/defense you can make...the only reason the SEC is good is because of the recruiting areas they reach i mean they reach al, ga, fl, louisiana, hell even into texas these are known throughout history as the best football states...take UGA, AU, Bama and throw them out in BFE Idaho and see what kind of recruits and caliber team they have put boise in the SEC and they would gain SEC caliber recruits instead of WAC recruits in due time then what would be your argument. Boise has proven themselves for the past 3 years, they lost to nevada because of a kicker. And since we are on the topic of making excuses for georgia, what is there excuse from last year the started what....i believe it was 0-3 right, were they rebuilding then too...to each their own boiise will be in the talks all year so get used to hearing their name and keep in mind they put it on "tha dawgs"
the question is not "why isnt boise state a legit contender?"... you answered that question for me. I'm simply stating that they are not. You confirmed and offered an excuse on their behalf.

At the end of the day..... Boise is Boise because theyre Boise.... and Boise is a pretender team in a bad conference.