Originally Posted by
DemonEyez
i did invalidate most of your arguements. you just spew the same stuff out. again you feel your opinion is the only one that counts on games.
and sure upscaling creates the pixels but in the end what determines the quality is the Source.
or are you gonna tell me upscaling dvd = hd dvdor even blu-ray?
I can watch that video of yours sure. u wanna watch some of mine? we could throw them at each other. it will be a game! not.
You're not honestly going to try and argue to me that there's as much depth to gameplay in a racing game as there is in an FPS are you?
I love how you try to create a valid arguement and judge a game such as killzone 2 without playing it or seeing it in action. That alone will make everyone think you have the best arguement on here.
I actually have seen Killzone Two in action.
Also, Killzone 1 sucked.
3 years isnt that great of a warranty if still 10% of those 34% arent warrantied. and u still have to deal with delays on getting your unit back etc etc when you ship em out.
All I really have to say about this is "oh well". If you're buying a system now that isn't a concern.
P.S adding heatsinks doesnt solve the problem and it hasnt so far. The problem was the core architecture thus they wanted to redesign it with the falcon core.
Actually, the problem was it was overheating.
The idea with the 65nm "Falcon" core is it generates less heat, they're taking more than one step to remedy the problem.
your right hd dvd wasnt essential to play games. but blu-ray was because 5 years later games will need 50gb to play.. and the 360 will be looking for some other way to fully incorporate it games.. ooo i know lets make the game downloads. So people have to buy our stupidly priced hd's.
5 years from now we will be in a new generation of systems entirely.
your arguement that fps's have more varied gamestyles isnt true. play on any server for just 3 days and u'll be able to notice how each and every player plays. they do the same things. its not hard.
If you actually read what I said you'd notice that I was saying there are more elements to an FPS than pulling the trigger quickly and centering your crosshairs on a head. Must I state everything explicitly?
play starcraft and you'll see just as many different people play different ways. its not just fps's. What does make fps's generally more popular is that anyone can play it and be somewhat decent. you dont have to be smart to play em and so realistically its a great genre for most people in the U.S. we want a mindless game. puzzle games dont do well like they do elsewhere. Rpg's dont do as well. strategy games dont also.
I was actually comparing FPS to racing games. Read and comprehend.
btw having more ram doesnt mean its better. the architecture on the ps3 and how it efficiently utilizes its resources makes it far superior. case and point look at the older p4's and the older amd's regarding their l1 and l2 caches. the amd's ran alot better due to how they set the architecture and the intel's worked but kinda sucked it up. nowdays intel's learned tho.
Yeah, why would you want enough RAM so that way it doesn't bottle neck the data? That is ridiculous.
Furthermore, why do you bring something TOTALLY unrelated into this? The intel and AMD bit has NO relevance at all.
Again same with GPU.
Yeah, I'm sure you don't want the best GPU when you buy a gaming computer either.
you sir also provide idiotic statements. That i think its superior because it costs more. I know its superior because i know how it works. and yes its harder to program but in time with dev kits it will become easier. everything that was new at one point was "hard to program" but now their considered easy.
Really? Because an actual quote from the Splinter Cell developers is "PS3 isn't capable of generating quality AI".
And that is why Splinter Cell will not be revisiting Playstation 3.
Annnnd if i continue typing anymore the prof is gonna throw me outta the class.
Reply With Quote