Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 86 of 86

Thread: my new to me rx7

  1. #81
    TOYOTA1515
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,254
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Mater of facts the RB26DETT is not an SR20DT counterpart, that would be the CA18DET, what he meant was that an SR20 with 2 more pistons would be an engine Nissan never produce, like the Mazda 4 Rotor.
    SR20 Carbed Datsun B310

  2. #82
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dragoncelica View Post
    Mater of facts the RB26DETT is not an SR20DT counterpart, that would be the CA18DET, what he meant was that an SR20 with 2 more pistons would be an engine Nissan never produce, like the Mazda 4 Rotor.
    Gotcha, but what does that matter?

  3. #83
    TOYOTA1515
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,254
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Nothing
    Lol
    SR20 Carbed Datsun B310

  4. #84
    Senior Member | IA Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Columbus GA
    Age
    42
    Posts
    11,435
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simontibbett View Post
    Really? Because I ever argued about the 787B? lol....

    There's no way to win an argument that started on opinions, I can't make him like what I like, so what's the point in continuing?



    You clearly did research on the 787B, because the win at Le Mans was the only win they had that was controversial and luck. You never backed up any championships or series race wins. All this started with was rotaries are great road race engines with loads of success, I even said the Le Mans win wasn't really on my list of success as I'm the first to say that win was 100% luck.

    You argue competition adjustments when the reality is EVERY car racing has adjustments to be competitive. V8, V12, V10, turbo 4 cylinder, doesn't matter, they all have adjustments. Typically rotaries face very tight restrictor plate restrictions and that was the death of rotaries in professional sports car racing aside from the GA RX-8s which will be done after this year.

    In the end it doesn't matter, it's road racing, pick what you want to run with and race. If everyone ran V8s we would change the name...to NASCAR. I don't know what you were getting at with the SR20 thing, you're saying the R26B was an unfair engine because it wasn't a production engine? lol
    yeah, every race car has adjustments to make it competitive. In my opinion...... the rotary showing up with the attitude of "look at poor us, we need to remove some weight to be competitive" makes my point for me. If we go to a bracket race and a civic has a 3 second head start over a mustang and then beats that mustang by .1 second, then we can make the case that the mustang is the better car even though the civic did win under the circumstances and rules. THAT is the argument i am making against rotaries....... the rotary engine's crowning achievement is one that required the rest of the field to be heavily handicapped to give them a chance.

    Rotary faces very tight restrictions????? like what???? actually having to recognize their real displacement? is that being heavily restricted? "hey rotary guys.... we're not gonna let you tell us your engine has the displacement of a weedeater anymore"

    Rotard - "ZOMGZZZZ these restrictions are too much?!?!?!?!??!"

    Rotary engines are unique and interesting. They are not better than pistons engines. You know how i know that????


    because Honda didnt do it.

  5. #85
    TOYOTA1515
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,254
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Here they must use this one istead!

    SR20 Carbed Datsun B310

  6. #86
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinfix_15 View Post
    yeah, every race car has adjustments to make it competitive. In my opinion...... the rotary showing up with the attitude of "look at poor us, we need to remove some weight to be competitive" makes my point for me. If we go to a bracket race and a civic has a 3 second head start over a mustang and then beats that mustang by .1 second, then we can make the case that the mustang is the better car even though the civic did win under the circumstances and rules. THAT is the argument i am making against rotaries....... the rotary engine's crowning achievement is one that required the rest of the field to be heavily handicapped to give them a chance.

    Rotary faces very tight restrictions????? like what???? actually having to recognize their real displacement? is that being heavily restricted? "hey rotary guys.... we're not gonna let you tell us your engine has the displacement of a weedeater anymore"

    Rotard - "ZOMGZZZZ these restrictions are too much?!?!?!?!??!"

    Rotary engines are unique and interesting. They are not better than pistons engines. You know how i know that????


    because Honda didnt do it.
    I'm done with this convo, it's going nowhere, you're arguing about Le Mans when I'm agreeing with you and ignoring everything else.

    I still love you.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!