Quote Originally Posted by Sinfix_15 View Post
yeah, every race car has adjustments to make it competitive. In my opinion...... the rotary showing up with the attitude of "look at poor us, we need to remove some weight to be competitive" makes my point for me. If we go to a bracket race and a civic has a 3 second head start over a mustang and then beats that mustang by .1 second, then we can make the case that the mustang is the better car even though the civic did win under the circumstances and rules. THAT is the argument i am making against rotaries....... the rotary engine's crowning achievement is one that required the rest of the field to be heavily handicapped to give them a chance.

Rotary faces very tight restrictions????? like what???? actually having to recognize their real displacement? is that being heavily restricted? "hey rotary guys.... we're not gonna let you tell us your engine has the displacement of a weedeater anymore"

Rotard - "ZOMGZZZZ these restrictions are too much?!?!?!?!??!"

Rotary engines are unique and interesting. They are not better than pistons engines. You know how i know that????


because Honda didnt do it.
I'm done with this convo, it's going nowhere, you're arguing about Le Mans when I'm agreeing with you and ignoring everything else.

I still love you.