Quote Originally Posted by EJ_Allmota View Post
a good bit of the images in the OP are nice but a decent amount of them are overdone to me..
-every image in that post could have been produced by a Point and Shoot camera and good Post Processing.. There is no depth of field in the majority of them, some seem quite flat actually..


I dont agree with the statement at all.. Before photoshop there were excellent photographers and produced amazing images..
I didn't say photoshop, I said post processing, which has existed as long as photography itself. Go ask any of the National Geographic photographers, or Ansel Adams how he went about taking pictures. Hell, ask Nemesis, Changaroo or even Chad and Puregroove.

Everyone denying the use of post processing in thsi thread has a lot to learn about photography, the one argument about being overdone is an exception, as it is intelligently written from the viewpoint of someone who seems to know a bit about photography. Some of them do look a bit harsh and flat to me too, but there is no denying as a whole, the guy is very good.