I wouldn't do it but I guess others will. I know it's alot cheaper to build a K20 but after fabrication it'll cost about the same as to turbo a NSX motor. It's to much work but hey it's something new.
![]()
I wouldn't do it but I guess others will. I know it's alot cheaper to build a K20 but after fabrication it'll cost about the same as to turbo a NSX motor. It's to much work but hey it's something new.
![]()
um? Different. But yeah, i'd keep the 6 cylinder.
That's a big why lol
lulz wut.
a sprayed turbo k series in an nsx.
i can't think of many LOGICAL reasons to do this.
What?
maybe the nsx was a theft recovery and the k swap may be cheaper than a nsx motor only real reason i see someone would ditch the stock nsx motor
i would hope so,Originally Posted by JDMJAYDC2
Or maybe its just a Really Bad Joke
it a weird swap but creative
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
The motors lighter??? That could be my only guess. Other than that its like taking a LS1 out of a vette and putting a 4.3 in it. Makes no sence.
One Big Ass Mistake America
really?Originally Posted by SLOWR/T
tehehhe *runs*
Yup. I was waiting on you to say something.Originally Posted by Mr. Clean
One Big Ass Mistake America
yu knowz im da grammer natzeeOriginally Posted by SLOWR/T
why would anyone do this to an NSX ?
well why would someone go SR over KA??Originally Posted by cactusEG
light weight.
dun dun dun!!!
and why would a fat boy like you dont get something with more power and tq.![]()
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
i like it.
really nice.
why not though? they swap 2jz's out for 3sgte's in supras for racing the for jgtc...why because of lighter weight and almost the same power potential
house of turbo subarus...its all we'll drive
is it just me or does that turbo look like its in the complete wrong place?
Originally Posted by DieselNuts
research man. this is 2009. not everyone have LOG manifold anymore.
![]()
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
That swap is pure fail.
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Now back up, put the gun down, and get me a pack of Tropical Fruit BubbliciousOriginally Posted by Mike Lowrey
LAME! K is the swap of the decade in integra and civic chassis, not NSX chassis.
Just why? The NSX is already a pretty balanced car, therefore throwing the K in it could jeopardize the handling of the car. If money is problem, get out of the game! Don't buy a car, you can't maintain.
How many NSX's have you seen on a road course? How many NSX's do you see successful on road courses? They're twitchy just like the S2k and cost ALOT to maintain. Like VTECKIDD said, two of everything on the engine. You can get them for under $20k. I almost bought a one owner '91 with all maintenance records in '03 with 99k miles for $18k, immaculate condition. There was no way I could get a loan on a 13 year old car and I wished I traded my Land Rover in on it!Originally Posted by bigdare23
I can promise you reducing weight near the CENTER of a car is not going to jeopardize anything...it is a mid-engine car remember? lol! I've seen chassis' go for under under $10k years ago so it's really nothing that special other than a really nice aluminum unibody to start a project with.
my bad, I don't like Hondas anyway, so why would I do research on them?Originally Posted by jew_boy
a part of me just died![]()
- 06 sentra spec v
Makes sense to me, especially if you are paying a shop to do all your work.
Lets say they are starting with a bare chassis, with no motor or trans. A nsx motor and trans is going to cost like 8-10 grand. Then add another 5 or 6 grand for the motor build, and another 9 grand for a BASIC love fab kit. You are looking around 22 grand for ~400 whp. Thats not even counting instillation, a decent ems, and all the other shit that will nickel and dime you to death..... Se we will say 30k
I think you could have a reliable 500whp kseries for about half of that.
Originally Posted by lovefab.com
![]()
yea boost on those v6 are not cheap at all and they max out around 430hp u can get the same power outta the k series for alot cheaper and the weight savings would be nice
i want my money back
=EJ-EG SQUAD SUPPORTER=2000 HONDA CIVIC - SOLD1966 MUSTANG COUPE - TRADED1989 FOXBODY MUSTANG - DD
same reason they did this i guess.....
http://www.modified.com/sportculture/feature_nov01.html
Ur the man Chad..I was just about to post something like this..I know of atleast 4 350z professional drift cars that have either Blown the motor or started without one and put sr20s in them..I know the Parts are Alot cheaper and still have almost the same Hp capabilities as the v6..Basically the same concept here..K20s can hold 400whp daily on stock internals..Spend 1000 on a Sleeve And Turn the Boost up!Originally Posted by CH@Dbee
when i had my 350z i was thinking about doing a SR swap. people said i was stupidOriginally Posted by B00STedSvT
![]()
people will say the K series NSX is stupid too. id rather have a K24 with type S head thats boosted in a NSX over a C30A or C32B. cheaper and alot easier to make power.
a K24A1 from the CRV has 9:6:1 factory compression, toss a type s head on that bitch and some boost and you got semi-decent TQ for a honda and can make 450whp stock block with a lighter motor. how much will it take to get a C30A to 450whp? bang for the buck baby!
Not much at all....this is pointless the hp turbo hit made 600 hp on stock nsx motor...so yea..
[IMG]IMG_0655_2[/IMG]
wouldn't you want more weight since its mid engine that shit would loose traction in a minute?
zoom-zoom-zoom