Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: What tha fuk is going on?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    step sticky stephen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    41
    Posts
    481
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MS3ZZ
    very interesting comment from one of the member of marketwatch.com

    This is regarding deflationary depression that might be heading toward us.

    by hookupjjj
    http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...2B%7D#comments

    Our money is entirely create from debt. If ALL debt was retired in our country, there would be NO money. Deflation is defined as a reduction in the credit/money supply. Everytime a loan is created it increases the money supply. Once that loan is retired, the money that was created is also retired.

    This would all be different if the money was actually printed. But only a very small fraction of money created is actually ever printed. Only the money needed to carry our day to day transactions is printed. Near ALL of our money is nothing more than book entries, or today, a computer entry.

    Our fiat debt based money system REQUIRES inflation. If you go and buy a house on debt, at first you may have a hard time affording it. But due to inflation your wages increase and after a few years your mortgage payment becomes less and less of a percentage of your income. Same with the government. They borrow, get in over our heads, but they know that due to inflation their revenues will increase. So this HUGE debt, in theory, becomes less and less percentage of revenue.

    Currently the subprime markets are seeing increasing defaults. Remember, when a debt is retired, it decreases the money supply. That computer entry that created the money is now zero. That money is gone. Into thin air, from which it came. Debt can also be retired by default or a debt being forgiven. So massive defaults are deflationary, they take money out of the system.

    Lately the FED has lost its control, and Greenspan has openly talked about this in an interview a couple months ago. When he dropped rates to near zero, mortgage rates followed. But recently as rates have been increased, mortgages did not follow. Mortgage rates did increase but not proportionately to the previous decrease.

    For those who remember, in 2002 Greenspan was talking a lot about "the risk of deflation" to our economy. This was the purpose of cutting rates to near zero. This was to encourage borrowing. Borrowing increases the money supply. At the same time, for those who remember, Bush issued tax rebates. Another increase in the money supply. Both are only temporary bandaids, and result in a larger problem later on (which is nearing).

    So inflation is kept going to avoid deflation. Inflation is a increase in the credit supply, increasing debt. To increase debt REQUIRES 2 things. A WILLING BORROWER and a WILLING LENDER. When the banks lose confidence, they stop lending. When borrowers lose confidence, they stop borrowing. This is what controls the FEDS effectiveness. The FED lowers and raises rates to encourage/discourage lending. But this is their only control, they can't fully control the emotional side, the confidence equation.

    In 2001 as the recession set in, the borrower lost confidence in borrowing, as is normal in a recession. Lower rates persuaded borrowers to borrow. Borrowers are not as smart as lenders, and more easy to persuade into borrowing. With lower rates borrowers were persuaded to buy new, bigger houses. They cashed out equity in their homes for consumption. And the money supply inflated, the desired goal.

    This time around, as the subprime markets crumble, the Lenders have lost confidence. The FED has been injecting 100's of billions into the credit markets. But the credit markets have still stopped a large portion of lending. They are holding onto the cash as they fear that as this unwinds they may need it to cover their ASSetts. This failure to persuade Lenders to lend, combined with increasing defaults, is resulting in a failure to inflate and leading to deflation.

    Bushes Tax Rebates. Bush is borrowing for us, increasing the money supply, to avoid deflation. He is borrowing for us because, well because he can, and we can't. When I say we can't I'm referring to the banks loss of confidence, they have cut back significantly on lending. When deflation rears its head, SOMEONE has to borrow, increase the money/credit supply, to inflate.

    Fiat debt based money systems are ALL ABOUT ever increasing debt. Without it, they collapse into deflation through defaults. Deflation results in falling prices, wages included. As prices fall, there are less profits for corporations and corp. debt defaults increase causing further deflation. Wages drop resulting in large defaults in consumer debt further increasing deflation. At this point BOTH borrowers and lenders have lost confidence. Deflation continues to spiral downward until most debt has been cleansed from the system, and someone starts borrowing again. This someone is usually the government and usually to finance a war. The USA has gone though 4 depressions since its inception. Near the bottom of all these depressions you find a war followed by economic recovery. The larger the depression has been, the larger the wars have been.

    Note: If the FED starts actually printing all the money, then we're in for hyperinflation, as once the money physically exist, it does not dissappear when a default occurs as it does currently. Germany, before they totally collapsed, was printing physical moeny so fast the they started printing on only one side of the bill, to speed up the printing. The back side of their bill was blank
    that was a pretty interesting article. the problem though, is that if you increase our debt, without increasing wages, then they're bound to result in a default. as the article stated, defaults essential result in ZERO money. the main issue though, is WAGES.

    "...Our fiat debt based money system REQUIRES inflation. If you go and buy a house on debt, at first you may have a hard time affording it. But due to inflation your wages increase and after a few years your mortgage payment becomes less and less of a percentage of your income..."

    this is the part that has failed us...wages never increased. once these institutions handed out all of these loans, there was never a plan to increase wages to support these loans....meanwhile, lenders are stuffing this money in their pockets (GREED is what we call it). this is a prime example of how the "middle-class" is the true backbone of our economy. instead of increasing the amount of money an "average" citizen could take home, which would further increase the amount of money they can spend; we were given "subprime" lending opportunities for property that we could only dream of having...for a limited time ONLY! the rates increased, yet, wages stayed the same, now taking up MORE AND MORE of a percentage of your income. now, all of these companies that were making loads of money off of this plan, NOT SAVING ANY OF IT, and are now hurting along WITH the average citizen...call it the "TRICKLE UP" effect. now, EVERYONE has to pay!

    it takes money to make money...that's the bottom line...there's no way around it.

  2. #2
    Moderator BanginJimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stephen
    "...Our fiat debt based money system REQUIRES inflation. If you go and buy a house on debt, at first you may have a hard time affording it. But due to inflation your wages increase and after a few years your mortgage payment becomes less and less of a percentage of your income..."
    If you have a hard time affording the house you bought, then you didnt buy within your means.

    Wages should only increase with benchmarks, IE: time on job, promotion, additional education.

  3. #3
    John Paul II, wat!? blaknoize's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Age
    39
    Posts
    6,294
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
    If you have a hard time affording the house you bought, then you didnt buy within your means.

    Wages should only increase with benchmarks, IE: time on job, promotion, additional education.
    But as we all know as human in this world. We all tend to want more than we can afford, that instant gratification stuff. Unlike us (the investors, rich or poor) understand that concept of living within ones means. Thats why I havent purchased that fukin new Si or even the Sentra I've been hyped up about.

    Those of us who dont force ourselves to wait and try to resist temptation can do this. (Though some do it for other reasons... like giving ur family more living space.) Which I kno my sister almost became a statistic. Since she has 4 lil kids and a 2 bedroom apartment.

    CHASE ->>>
    WHAT MATTERS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!