Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 82 of 82

Thread: Fair Tax debate ONLY

  1. #81
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  2. #82
    Moderator BanginJimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    First, politicians cannot be trusted with a new tax traded for some existing tax
    They cannot be trusted with the current tax system. This one is just more visable and applied to everyone, not just certain groups.

    Further, the FairTax proposal can be passed by a simple majority of both houses of Congress plus the President's signature. But the much-touted repeal of the 16th Amendment, which authorizes the income tax, requires a much more demanding 2/3 vote in each house and then approval by ¾ of state legislatures. The likelihood of ending up with both the 23% federal tax and the current income tax is therefore all the greater.
    The bills in both the house and senate have language to prevents the institution of the fairtax until the 16th amendment is repealed.

    Second, the proposed national retail sales tax will be set at 23 percent to replace the revenues from the individual and corporate income tax, as well as the payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare. Added to this 23 percent tax will be the states' average sales taxes of more than 6 percent.
    We already pay that sales tax so this is a nonissue.

    A 29 percent sales tax will generate pressure to turn the sales tax into a value-added tax (VAT).
    This is nothing but baseless conjecture.

    withholding was created in part to mask the actual level of taxation.
    Something we actually agree about.

    Added to this is the very serious concern of so many Americans becoming accustomed to a monthly check from Uncle Sam. A massive constituency will be created which will pressure Congress for increases in the definition of necessities.
    There is plenty of research to back the amount of money that a family should receive for a prebate. We all know congress with try to add to that though in an effort to buy votes. This is already being done though with increases in welfare benefits, promises of tax cuts and other handout programs.

    And fourth – and most importantly – working on this tax trade diverts scarce political energy from the cause of limiting federal spending and taxation to the cause of rearranging the means of tax collections.
    no tax plan will ever limit govt spending. At least under the fairtax we can decide how much of our money goes to the govt. After that, we have no clue control with the fairtax than we do now.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!