
Originally Posted by
Jaimecbr900
When you asked the original question. I don't think you really know what the definition of "villain" is.
Here it is:
vilˇlain
noun
1. a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel.
2. a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot.
Just exactly what part of that definition fits Bush? In turn, does #1 not fit Saddam like a glove? So again, I don't think you realize what the true definition of what you're asking is.
I think you don't agree with the war. That is perfectly fine and acceptable, but what you really should ask yourself is not so much WHY we went to war with Iraq as much as HOW the U.S. and the rest of the world (a world that was too coward to make Saddam abide by the rules yet now will benefit from US doing it) will be better off w/o this guy.
BTW, your friends have to understand that when they enlisted in the Armed Forces their Commander-in-Chief is the President. Like it or not, that's the chain of command. If he says fight, you fight. So if they're not happy doing what their superiors tell them to, they certainly got into the wrong line of work. With that said, I still respect every enlisted person for doing something a lot of us choose not to do.