Originally Posted by B18c1Turboed
see what i bolded
Peters was a 1.8l with stock head, im not sure on camshafts, rods and pistons, and a similar manifold and turbo.
i was merely comparing POWERBAND, not peak whp. What i was saying was that if we show a 4th gear pull vs peters 4th gear pull, we see that it was spooling FASTER than peters, and was on par to make ALOT more power than what peter made THAT DAY. and i would expect so, Spoolins is a 2.0l and peters was a 1.8l. I would like to see peters 700+whp dyno out of his 2.0l graphed over Spoolins , that would give us a great comparison of gear vs gear and spool vs spool.
Peters is the only B series 600whp dyno i have to compare against, thats why i used it. im just saying the "laggy " powerband argument is based on incorrect data. When i post the 4th gear pull from spoolin vs his 622whp 3rd gear pull and peters 4th gear pull , it is evident that we were comparing apples to oranges.
had his clutch held, it would have made 630-650 i bet money on it. that would have been a better powerband and the spool would have been faster, which is evident.