Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Toyota really does suck that bad. They're saying no AWD for the coming Subaru Coupe.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default Toyota really does suck that bad. They're saying no AWD for the coming Subaru Coupe.

    http://www.7tune.com/no-awd-for-subarus-ft-86-clone/



    No AWD For Subaru’s Version Of The FT-86

    March 13, 2010 by Justin Karow
    Filed under Japanese News, Latest Articles

    Cost overruns have made Subaru think again about developing an AWD version of its FT-86 based sports car.

    no_4wd_for_suabaru_261a

    It’s been a while since we reported that Subaru were working on an AWD system for its 216A variant of the FT-86 compact sports car and since then some changes have come about concerning the driveline and how that could impact sales. Apparently development costs have spiralled to the point where Subaru can no longer justify the inclusion of the AWD system and as a result has brought some doubt upon the 216A’s ultimate sales potential as a ‘clone’. This has essentially rendered the rumored STi variant a carbon copy of the FT-86 G Sports Concept under its skin, so Subaru have now turned to exterior styling to make up for the lack of mechanical differentiation from the FT-86.

    To bring added individuality to the 216A, the focus in now on redesigning the area from the A-pillar forward and giving it a more distinctive front end design rather than merely swapping badges and putting on a different grille. If Toyota do indeed go ahead and release the G Sports version of the FT-86, Subaru will counter that with its own STi version which will then provide the basis for an R205-like special edition.

    Prices for the STi and G Sports versions are expected to be 3.5 million JPY and 3 million JPY respectively, with the base model for both automakers to sell for around 2.5 million JPY.

  2. #2
    Senior Member nreggie454's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Athens/Memphis
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,602
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    I just read this on a different site. It's a shame. "Hey, AWD is waaay too expensive. Let's just give it a badass body kit and nobody will know the difference!"
    UGA: Everybody is laughing at us this year.

  3. #3
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nreggie454 View Post
    I just read this on a different site. It's a shame. "Hey, AWD is waaay too expensive. Let's just give it a badass body kit and nobody will know the difference!"
    That's what happens when half of America is trying to sue you.

    Funny how Subaru who gets everything right gets f'ed by the world's most boring car company.

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB View Post
    it doesnt really need to be awd. If it was where would the impreza /'Wrx/sti fit in. they would be just competing with each other.
    AWD is the #1 piece of brand identity for Subaru. All the AWD marketing over the last 20 years goes out the window and Subaru becomes another mean nothing and stand for nothing car company.

  4. #4
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN View Post
    That's what happens when half of America is trying to sue you.

    Funny how Subaru who gets everything right gets f'ed by the world's most boring car company.



    AWD is the #1 piece of brand identity for Subaru. All the AWD marketing over the last 20 years goes out the window and Subaru becomes another mean nothing and stand for nothing car company.


    i know that is the one thing that kind of hurts this decision. BUT, they should have ironed this out before they started this project. from a business standpoint its a better move. because subaru doesnt need another awd tuner type vehicle in its lineup. its not like Wrxs and imprezas are flying of the lots as is.

    toyota is pretty boring...lol cant deny that..

  5. #5
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    it doesnt really need to be awd. If it was where would the impreza /'Wrx/sti fit in. they would be just competing with each other.

  6. #6
    Certified Gearhead ghostrida3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    45
    Posts
    211
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    It doesn't bother me. The purpose of this car I thought was to be an affordable entry level rwd platform. Like a 240 or the old school corrolla. It seems like in the last 20 years u have to buy either something.used or have enough money to get a z, or settle for the fwd entry level cars. Its about time they made something fun that's affordable and rwd-something that had some oversteer. If I got money for awd I would just buy an sti or a more expensive rwd coupe anyway and wouldn't even be looking for an ft-86. Sorry if my punctuation sucks my Droid is giving me problems today.
    Juice? What's that? I want some of that purple stuff

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!