originally posted by jesse4846
even with all the work put into them, hondas are STILL relatively inexpensive cars. why steal a turbo civic when you can steal an m3?

theres nothing wrong with a turbo civic, but it just seems to me that a more expensive car would be more desireable and more frequently stolen.

Mentioned in a previous post. The parts issue. Customer base. How fast do you think those parts on said turbo civic are going to move, rather than on a M3? Thieves don't want to have **** laying around for long. Enough stolen hondas can add up quick as well. I was shocked to hear that even a 1990 toyota camry is on the top list of stolen cars.