Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 80 of 86

Thread: SRT-4 vs. Mazdaspeed 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Go Dawgs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    SouthSide
    Age
    43
    Posts
    2,758
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    i heard to many horror story's about wrx trannys, srt-4's are played out, so mazdaspeed6 it is! the mazda seems like its built better then the srt also. just my 2 cents
    Tuned by Lil Ray Ray's


  2. #2
    SR powered S14 chituntang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ATL, GA
    Age
    40
    Posts
    737
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    MS3 FTW!!! We all need a car that can turn!!!

  3. #3
    always dirty.... SandM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    L'ville
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,852
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    evo ftw...... its not a choice, but if i were looking in that price range/engine style, id choose the evo to dominate all aspects of driving....



  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14,924
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I would go with the Mazdaspeed 3, better interior, looks better IMO, and its not a Neon.
    SRT-4's can be made quick real easily. Not so sure about the MS3, haven't seen or heard of any of them being heavily modded. Just like all turbo cars, im sure it can be made fast with upgraded turbo, and supporting mods.

    I would test drive both if I was you.

  5. #5
    Low-n-Slow iEvo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Gnett
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,288
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    srt4 ftw......u cant do sh!t to a mazdaspeed

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14,924
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackIX
    u cant do sh!t to a mazdaspeed
    Says who?

  7. #7
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackIX
    srt4 ftw......u cant do sh!t to a mazdaspeed

    i have herd the car has alot of electronics that limit it, but that is for driveability puposes, it hasnt been out long enough yet. for all that stuff to be worked out yet. The car has too many good attributes to not have any aftermarket.

  8. #8
    Zoom Zoom kfzemx3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    atlanta
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,218
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    i have herd the car has alot of electronics that limit it, but that is for driveability puposes, it hasnt been out long enough yet. for all that stuff to be worked out yet. The car has too many good attributes to not have any aftermarket.
    Agreed And considering this is the same motor that mazda is using now for racing instead of the rotories since they were recently banned, i see a lot of potential for this car in the years to come
    I spend money on HP not Brand Names.

    08 Infiniti G37s 6MT [The Daily Beast]
    05 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII MR [Sold]
    01 Lexus Is300 [Under Construction]
    93 mazda Mx-3 SE 2.5 Klze [Sold]
    92 mazda mx-3 GS 2.0 Kfze [I Killed it]

  9. #9
    Cruzan Boy Siverprobegt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ga/VI BREED
    Age
    49
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kfzemx3
    Agreed And considering this is the same motor that mazda is using now for racing instead of the rotories since they were recently banned, i see a lot of potential for this car in the years to come
    Why were they banned!!!

    92 mx3

  10. #10
    Zoom Zoom kfzemx3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    atlanta
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,218
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siverprobegt
    Why were they banned!!!
    well they were basically unbeatable, plus people started complaining because they weren't piston motors. i mean i understand, but i think the same should be done to audi and there diesel motor.
    I spend money on HP not Brand Names.

    08 Infiniti G37s 6MT [The Daily Beast]
    05 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII MR [Sold]
    01 Lexus Is300 [Under Construction]
    93 mazda Mx-3 SE 2.5 Klze [Sold]
    92 mazda mx-3 GS 2.0 Kfze [I Killed it]

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14,924
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Seriously, which one would you guys take? On looks alone.

    Here is a stock SRT-4 ---- BORING



    And here is a MS3 with rims ---- ALOT BETTER

  12. #12
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maniac †
    Seriously, which one would you guys take? On looks alone.

    Here is a stock SRT-4 ---- BORING



    And here is a MS3 with rims ---- ALOT BETTER

    That pic of the ms3 is with the Optional Light weight wheels that are supposed to be released.. i believe!

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14,924
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    That pic of the ms3 is with the Optional Light weight wheels that are supposed to be released.. i believe!
    If thats true, they makes it look really NICE!

  14. #14
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maniac †
    If thats true, they makes it look really NICE!

    i think it might be, i just saw a video on you tube with the same wheels..

  15. #15
    IA's Heroin Addict hXc007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Powder Springs
    Age
    40
    Posts
    722
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    me personally, i prefer the neon srt-4

    they look pretty cool (except for the ugly ass stock wheels) and sound mean as **** modded (like tiny high mpg muscle cars lol)
    Glory, Glory Man United

  16. #16
    Carless Ericp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    McDonough
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,713
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    /\/\/\ says the guy that drives a civic cause those are so cool.....


    Quote Originally Posted by Maniac †
    Seriously, which one would you guys take? On looks alone.

    Here is a stock SRT-4 ---- BORING



    And here is a MS3 with rims ---- ALOT BETTER
    I agree, the srt doesn't look like much stock. That's an old picture by the way, not the wheels the srt came with both close enough.

    To me the MS3 looks like a goofy little mini van, but is still a nice car and are quick from factory.


    But if looks are a problem, just like any car, you can do things to make it look better. Here are just a small few pics


















  17. #17
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericp
    /\/\/\ says the guy that drives a civic cause those are so cool.....




    I agree, the srt doesn't look like much stock. That's an old picture by the way, not the wheels the srt came with both close enough.

    To me the MS3 looks like a goofy little mini van, but is still a nice car and are quick from factory.


    But if looks are a problem, just like any car, you can do things to make it look better. Here are just a small few pics
    cheater....nice pics tho!

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    14,924
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericp
    I agree, the srt doesn't look like much stock. That's an old picture by the way, not the wheels the srt came with both close enough.

    To me the MS3 looks like a goofy little mini van, but is still a nice car and are quick from factory.


    But if looks are a problem, just like any car, you can do things to make it look better. Here are just a small few pics










    Damn, those look sexy as hell! =( Oops =D

  19. #19
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    905
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    I liked the power my SRT had, I made ungodly amounts of TQ, but the trade off is how much do you like 17-19mpg? Maybe if mopar would've come out with a kit to catch all the unburnt gas coming outta the tail, then I might have kept it. I kinda like the MS3, but I still woulnd't buy that either. I'm kinda outta my boy racer stage.....

  20. #20
    Unregistered User Member31410's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    770
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo04
    I liked the power my SRT had, I made ungodly amounts of TQ, but the trade off is how much do you like 17-19mpg? Maybe if mopar would've come out with a kit to catch all the unburnt gas coming outta the tail, then I might have kept it. I kinda like the MS3, but I still woulnd't buy that either. I'm kinda outta my boy racer stage.....
    The worst recorded tank of gas on my car was 21 mpg. The best was 33.2 mpg. I average 24-26 mpg driving around and on highways, I average 29-31 mpg. This is on a Mopar Stage 3 car untuned that has hit an 11.9 at the drag strip and has trapped up to 120 mph. This is also with no weight reduction on the car.
    2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4

  21. #21
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    905
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Member31410
    The worst recorded tank of gas on my car was 21 mpg. The best was 33.2 mpg. I average 24-26 mpg driving around and on highways, I average 29-31 mpg. This is on a Mopar Stage 3 car untuned that has hit an 11.9 at the drag strip and has trapped up to 120 mph. This is also with no weight reduction on the car.
    Whats the city only milege? I'm tooling around now average 32 in the city only, 40+ on the interstate with the mini. Not always going easy on her either. Untuned stage 3 car isn't quite right a description, if it's just a stg 3 kit, it's got the factory tune already on the PCM, which the also tuned for a decent gas milege. Also was that milege you said using the dial-a-boost?

  22. #22
    Unregistered User Member31410's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    770
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo04
    Whats the city only milege? I'm tooling around now average 32 in the city only, 40+ on the interstate with the mini. Not always going easy on her either. Untuned stage 3 car isn't quite right a description, if it's just a stg 3 kit, it's got the factory tune already on the PCM, which the also tuned for a decent gas milege. Also was that milege you said using the dial-a-boost?
    In my case, there isn't a thing such as city only milage. My work commute takes around 25 miles one way from one county to another. I use Hwy 316 to and from work. If you are not familiar with that highway, it is loaded with traffic lights and traffic is bad during the day. At night though, it is smooth sailing for me.

    As for the DAB (Dial-A-Boost) settings, from what I have experimented in my car, I get the same fuel economy regardless of the setting while driving around town so I have it set to almost always at DAB 3. On road trips though, I have noticed up to two more miles per gallon while on DAB 0 but who knows, maybe it might be because I'm easier on the throttle since I know I'm on lower boost. BTW the DAB feature only affects boost during wide open throttle. The 33.2 mpg best that I recorded was on DAB 0.

    As you have said, my car is sending out "unburnt gas outta the tail" too. All the Mopar stage kits are set pig rich from the factory including the stage 3 kits. My AFR goes off the chart everytime I dyno. Yeah I could get a piggy back and tune the car for more power and get better fuel economy but I'm totally fine with the S3 kit as is.
    2005 Dodge Neon SRT-4

  23. #23
    Senior Member 2turbo4u's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,998
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    MS3 cause it looks better, a get navi,h.id's from factory. The neon looks like a four door bug(insect) driving around. Even when they're drop they still have mad fist gap between the fenders.

  24. #24
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ft Myers, FL
    Posts
    607
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    I went to look at the new 3's at Rick Case about a year ago...they didn't have any yet and after looking at the Evo's I came across a SRT-4 they just pulled around on the lot...my friend has had 2 and I never felt slow with my old Tiburon till the day I went on a spirited drive with him...no comparison...I swore if I could find one with low miles I might get one...I did...23K and up for a Mazdaspeed 3...32K and up for an Evo...made my decision pretty easy for the NEON...17K...I like the 3's but they have little after market support and still are a station wagon...with mods even a SRT-4 can be made to look better...no regrets...peeps will always hate it because it is a Neon...whatever...

    before...pic the day I picked up my car...



    after...how it looks now...


  25. #25
    Rock the 40oz GTScoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    GA Tech
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,717
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Mazdaspeed 3 for sure over the SRT-4. Much higher caliber of a car (no pun intended), nicer interior, better exterior. Overall better quality of construction. I have heard that tuning the MS3s is a ***** but thats just because its a new platform and people need time to break the OEM code.
    02 WRX Sport Wagon


  26. #26
    Carless Ericp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    McDonough
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,713
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTScoob
    Mazdaspeed 3 for sure over the SRT-4. Much higher caliber of a car (no pun intended), nicer interior, better exterior. Overall better quality of construction. I have heard that tuning the MS3s is a ***** but thats just because its a new platform and people need time to break the OEM code.
    How exactly do you think the build quality is on the SRT-4? I don't know anything personally about the MS3 besides the basics. I've never owned one so I don't see how I could give my opinion on the build quality of it. So please enlighten me on your knowledge of the SRT-4

  27. #27
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    ive owned 2 neons, and have been aroudn a few of friends neons... and i will agree, that quality is in the share of mazda.. neons are made to be low cost cars....From what i gathered the srt4 isnt any different, its the same chassis since 95.. im sure ethings have gotten better, but im sure alot of things are the same. motor/tranny are solid its been proven. it has alot of capability. but as far as stuff you wish it had...the MS3 does have. ive never owned a 3, but i have owned plenty of mazda built cars. all mazdaspeed cars have had a great aftermarket, its just not as known.

    truthfully, the 2 arent really being compared, the real battle is between the caliber srt4, and the Ms3.. ms3 has already been marked higher than the neon srt4...

  28. #28
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Age
    40
    Posts
    165
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    ms3. Im little biased because i own ms3 but when i bought this car, i wanted a car that had little bit of everything. I looked at wrx as well as civic si and gti. WRX was quick, i loved the styling and the sound of mean boxer engine but interior was lacking and to me, awd in georgia is not really needed.. more of bragging right to me. Civic was nice but little slower than what i wanted. Had a hard time between GTI and MS3 but after the test drive, i coudnt really care about about superior interior quality of GTI over ms3.
    Overall, ms3 was quick, practical, and had decent creature comfort. For the money, you cant beat this car imo.

  29. #29
    CA18FTMFL BITCH!!!! JBalla1036's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Alpharetta
    Age
    40
    Posts
    685
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    MS3 cause at the end of the day the SRT-4 is still a dodge FTL!!!!

  30. #30
    Certified Gearhead atlxpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    atlanta
    Age
    36
    Posts
    693
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    stock for stock, MS3 has more hp and tq, better handling and better interior. i heard it torque steers like a mofo though.
    if it were awd i'd consider trading in the subie for it, that interior really gets to me

  31. #31
    Papasmurf #3!! Oz10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,749
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I would rather have the mazdaspeed 3 too. I just really like those cars.

  32. #32
    oH My BudDa
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,065
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I pick ms3 coz it handle much better than srt4 which can only go fast on a straight way. BTW, the interior of the SRT4 is fxxx compare to ms3.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!