I agree. As much as I defend stuff of this nature, it is not racism. It's actually stupidity, because the depiction is not a postive image from history, so I don't see it selling. I really don't see the point in them putting a black girl on one side and white boy on the other. Marketing was not well thought out IMO
Playing devils advocate, the white kid on the back could be placed there to justify the product.If in fact it was racially marketed, the black stores would have the black girl front faced, and the white areas would have the white boy front faced. Then the consumer gets home after the purchase and goes GTFO! LMAO, stupid people I tell you.






If in fact it was racially marketed, the black stores would have the black girl front faced, and the white areas would have the white boy front faced. Then the consumer gets home after the purchase and goes GTFO! LMAO, stupid people I tell you.
Reply With Quote