my reason for getting srt4

[osiriskidd]

ok first off no one said the srt handles great nor good they were built to go fast in a straight line thats why they werent worried about great handleing and what not. where the sti and evo were built for road and track racing and not straight line racing
sti's and evo's were budget 4door sports cars. they just so happen to excel at road&track.
second how is the srt 4 overrated? and why is a sti/wrx or evo so much better that have to charge 10k more and dont say cause their awd cause thats not worth the price difference.
because it's just a neon with a fat turbo slapped on priced to sell to young aged drivers who want to go fast but don't know shit about what they're buying.
-got traction?
And third dont even start about what type of race or color you see driving what car i see a shit done of mexicans and other races driving sti, wrx, evo, srt 4, civic, prelude, gti, jetta, supra, rx-7, celica, eclipse, ms3, ms6, cobalt ss, m3, sentra, etc. etc.
i can tell you what i've observed though. and i've seen mexicans in civics jettas preludes accord. but they're creeping into the str4's. why? because its a neon with a fat turbo slapped on priced at 12k

thats just some of it.

[CHADbee]

thats just some of it.

i was at mitshu yesterday, you call a 40K car a "budget car?"

that double what the SRT was new. stop comparing them. yes they are all 4 door factory turbo cars but 2 of them cost twice what the neon did.

hey did you know a Ferrari 430 is better than a corvette?