Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: 67 ford mustang turbo 302 fuel injected!

  1. #1
    IA SITE SPONSOR! silversol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LAWRENCEVILLE
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,211
    Rep Power
    37

    Default 67 ford mustang turbo 302 fuel injected!

    i thought this was a very cool build. and great modivation to finish the efi in my 67!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wp6t...eature=related
    Hella stock member!

  2. #2
    SuPeRsTaR CuStOmS dkjohnson04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    jupiter
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,631
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    that thing is MEAN!!!!!!!!

  3. #3
    <-- haha it a panda jew_boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,894
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    man chevy should have never sold the 302 design to ford

    92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver )
    98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)

  4. #4
    IA SITE SPONSOR! silversol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LAWRENCEVILLE
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,211
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bouncy!
    man chevy should have never sold the 302 design to ford
    what are you talking about. chevy never sold ford the 302 design to ford. chevy had a 302 ci engine also but that was the most ci you could run in the trans am series at the time
    Hella stock member!

  5. #5
    <-- haha it a panda jew_boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,894
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silversol
    what are you talking about. chevy never sold ford the 302 design to ford. chevy had a 302 ci engine also but that was the most ci you could run in the trans am series at the time
    well my bad then but i was told that chevy sold ford the design

    92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver )
    98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)

  6. #6
    <-- haha it a panda jew_boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,894
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silversol
    what are you talking about. chevy never sold ford the 302 design to ford. chevy had a 302 ci engine also but that was the most ci you could run in the trans am series at the time
    hold on trans am you must mine camaro

    92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver )
    98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)

  7. #7
    IA SITE SPONSOR! silversol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LAWRENCEVILLE
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,211
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    trans am SERIES RACING.
    Hella stock member!

  8. #8
    One of a Kind. DeeAOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    34
    Posts
    5,717
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    lol mike, just stop while your ahead...


    well your not really ahead anymore.


  9. #9
    <-- haha it a panda jew_boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,894
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    yeah i think i will, O'well

    92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver )
    98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)

  10. #10
    IA SITE SPONSOR! silversol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LAWRENCEVILLE
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,211
    Rep Power
    37
    Hella stock member!

  11. #11
    <-- haha it a panda jew_boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,894
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    this is what i was told and my thought. i know chevy made a 302 and had it in the camaros i think it was for like a year or two, but i was told chevy sold them to ford for some reason so yeah

    92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver )
    98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)

  12. #12
    Senior Member jfman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,865
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Is that turbo kit using only the driver side manifold ????

  13. #13
    just a lil SOHC... B_Hoov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Flowery Branch
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,185
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    sweet car but not really impressed with the power output...both the mustangs we have put down more than that and there N/A...and yes alot of people are using the one sided mani's like that now...you would think that would not work well but every application i have seen thus far has worked great, alot of 10.5 cars use the system as well.

  14. #14
    ( . )( . ) inmymouth _Christian_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dunwoody/Sandy Springs
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,631
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bouncy!
    this is what i was told and my thought. i know chevy made a 302 and had it in the camaros i think it was for like a year or two, but i was told chevy sold them to ford for some reason so yeah
    They have the same displacement, but are two completely different engines. Ford stroked their 289. Chevy put a 283 crank in their 327.

    reps to silversol


  15. #15
    IA SITE SPONSOR! silversol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    LAWRENCEVILLE
    Age
    40
    Posts
    10,211
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onebaddXJ@teamFX
    sweet car but not really impressed with the power output...both the mustangs we have put down more than that and there N/A...and yes alot of people are using the one sided mani's like that now...you would think that would not work well but every application i have seen thus far has worked great, alot of 10.5 cars use the system as well.
    the numbers are kind of low. but i think with a better set of heads and a few more pounds of boost it would really wake it up. but at 7 psi and e7 heads thats not to bad. but i still like the car a lot!
    Hella stock member!

  16. #16
    just a lil SOHC... B_Hoov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Flowery Branch
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,185
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    me too, alot of work went into it thats for sure

  17. #17
    Senior Member jfman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,865
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onebaddXJ@teamFX
    and yes alot of people are using the one sided mani's like that now...you would think that would not work well but every application i have seen thus far has worked great, alot of 10.5 cars use the system as well.
    So only one head is building boost. Doesnt that throw off the flow between the two head? The head without turbo will flow more than the othe head right...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!