i thought this was a very cool build. and great modivation to finish the efi in my 67!![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wp6t...eature=related
i thought this was a very cool build. and great modivation to finish the efi in my 67!![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Wp6t...eature=related
Hella stock member!
that thing is MEAN!!!!!!!!
man chevy should have never sold the 302 design to ford
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
what are you talking about. chevy never sold ford the 302 design to ford. chevy had a 302 ci engine also but that was the most ci you could run in the trans am series at the timeOriginally Posted by bouncy!
Hella stock member!
well my bad then but i was told that chevy sold ford the designOriginally Posted by silversol
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
hold on trans am you must mine camaroOriginally Posted by silversol
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
trans am SERIES RACING.
Hella stock member!
lol mike, just stop while your ahead...
well your not really ahead anymore.
yeah i think i will, O'well
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
just to give you a idea bouncy.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=110sm...eature=related
Hella stock member!
this is what i was told and my thought. i know chevy made a 302 and had it in the camaros i think it was for like a year or two, but i was told chevy sold them to ford for some reason so yeah
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
Is that turbo kit using only the driver side manifold ????
sweet car but not really impressed with the power output...both the mustangs we have put down more than that and there N/A...and yes alot of people are using the one sided mani's like that now...you would think that would not work well but every application i have seen thus far has worked great, alot of 10.5 cars use the system as well.
They have the same displacement, but are two completely different engines. Ford stroked their 289. Chevy put a 283 crank in their 327.Originally Posted by bouncy!
reps to silversol
the numbers are kind of low. but i think with a better set of heads and a few more pounds of boost it would really wake it up. but at 7 psi and e7 heads thats not to bad. but i still like the car a lot!Originally Posted by onebaddXJ@teamFX
Hella stock member!
me too, alot of work went into it thats for sure
So only one head is building boost. Doesnt that throw off the flow between the two head? The head without turbo will flow more than the othe head right...Originally Posted by onebaddXJ@teamFX