wow can't believe it beat it
HOLY ****!!!****ing awesome!!!!just toobad that he guy who dedsigned the new gtr says that the way it's tuned is the perfect tuning for the car and that as of right now he has pretty much made that car mod-proof.
wow that GTR is very impressive
stop hatin on the gt-rOriginally Posted by AnthonyF
Originally Posted by AnthonyF
![]()
yeahhhhhh you likeeeee when she does thattttttt
the gt-r had a tiny jump and the guy wasn't using the launch control. the gallardo is impressive, but at less than half the price, the gt-r is a monster
Hmmm... GT-R is slower than I thought if it can only inch by a gallardo (and it had a jump)
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
I agree on the price point and the jump. The Nissan better watch its ass around the new ZR-1.:idb:
N/A>>><<<BOOST
Sorry, I'll still take the SL
Totally agree but have to admit the GTR is still impressive.Originally Posted by tony
Most certainly the GT-R is impressive and ideally a dream garage would be both but if I had to choose.. SL
Would take the Lamborghini, for some reason I have yet to be really impressed by the GTR...it's just, boring. It's a Nissan. It can't be that cool.
Scenario 1 & 2Originally Posted by AnthonyF
1. Sleepin at the line is a loss
2. GTR awd system took a shorter time to get it's launch system to go. Besides, the SL had him at 60".
I would still take the "AUDI" over the GTR.
Or would I? .......*ponders*
Originally Posted by simontibbett
![]()
Daily - '03 Infiniti G35c Sport
Power - '03 Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
Beater - '97 GMC Jimmy
Originally Posted by fcman
Is a gallardo supposed to be slow or something???
x2 let alone the SL.Originally Posted by Nick
It has about 40-50hp less than the gtr (according to MT's 507whp on the gtr) So what would you expect?Originally Posted by Nick
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
Actually I think the GTR has 480whp.Originally Posted by fcman
Originally Posted by MistaCee
![]()
Read MT's review, they dyno'd at 507(sorry to the crank, assuming only 15% drivetrain loss) though they estimate it to be more around the 550 range, due to the fact that only 15% loss would be quite a feat with awd. So either Nissan is understating the HP, or they secretly upped the HP on the cars they sent to reviewers. Either way it's kinda suspicious.Originally Posted by MistaCee
Last edited by man; 05-06-2008 at 03:45 PM.
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt