9/11 Mysteries - Building Collapses

[GSRteg®]

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/621343...ing_collapses/

Strange, but true.

[changaroo]

crazy... +1
its like a lot of the other vids,

[Kelly]

What is it saying? I can't hear it...

[GSRteg®]

Not trying to be a smart ass, but did you have your volume turned up?

What is it saying? I can't hear it...

[Kelly]

Not trying to be a smart ass, but did you have your volume turned up?

Lol. I could listen to it if I wanted...

I'm just at work and would prolly get in trouble if they heard me listening to a random video.

[Sport1.3]

its a 911 conspiracy video. saying the twin towers were caused by a demolition and not by it actually collapsing. Whether its actually true is debatable....but still something to think about

[hondab118]

Theres nothing odd or a conspiracy. The twin towers were designed by an asian architec who used some techniques and designs used in asia to build building/skyscrapers on the twin towers. They used steel frames and some type of flexing poles. So in the event of a tragedy like it would collapse on itself. Im from NY, so i can only imagine how much more terrible if both the towers were actually topple over onto Downtown Manhattan. When the planes hit the towers there fuelsalage exploded aiding in the collapse.

[GSRteg®]

Yes, still debatable bc how the fuck did still beams fly into other buildings like that. There must have been a force pushing them out!!!!

its a 911 conspiracy video. saying the twin towers were caused by a demolition and not by it actually collapsing. Whether its actually true is debatable....but still something to think about

[Sport1.3]

Theres nothing odd or a conspiracy. The twin towers were designed by an asian architec who used some techniques and designs used in asia to build building/skyscrapers on the twin towers. They used steel frames and some type of flexing poles. So in the event of a tragedy like it would collapse on itself. Im from NY, so i can only imagine how much more terrible if both the towers were actually topple over onto Downtown Manhattan. When the planes hit the towers there fuelsalage exploded aiding in the collapse.

Close, but you're rather misleading. Actually, Minoru Yamasaki was an American architect. He even Studied at The University Of Washington and graduated in 1934. The towers were Co-designed by fellow Architect Emery Roth. The Building was a hull-core structure, Which is a traditional framework with its curtain-wall cladding is being superseded by a structure which consists of two concentric tubular walls, the hull and the core, with the floors spanning between them. Both walls are load-bearing and wind-resisting at the same time. The building was created to withstand such an event, not collapse in upon itself. Also the fuselage did not "explode" on impact. there is no fuel supply held in the fuselage, rather its held in the wings of the plane, which upon impact was scattered throughout the top floors as well as the exterior of the building. Whether or not its utter collapse was actually caused by the crash is still left to skeptics. there are proofs for both parties, as well as alot of seemingly odd missing information. Either way it was a horrible event.

this video even better explains the event according to Purdue University, which so happens to be a Largly Republican funded University. So there for still fought upon by skeptics, but still shows the best reconstruction of the event to date.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8

[Brut]

heres the freefall one too. man this stuff is crazy
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/625231...ries_freefall/

[Kelly]

It's crazy but really... Why would our government want to do something like this?

[Kelly]

And what about the people who stopped the plane from landing into the pentegon? Come on...

[man]

Strange, but true.

Unless you know anything about physics. I've sat through a weeks worth of lectures at Ga Tech where it was explained by one of the top physicists in the country. Not a conspiracy.

/discussion

[Kelly]

I would freaking hope not! Could you go into a little bit of detail for us?

[uproot]

It's crazy but really... Why would our government want to do something like this?

LOL... if you ask that, you would probably wonder why they would do something like Project MK Ultra:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKULTRA

http://peyote.com/jonstef/mkultra.htm

[hondab118]

Close, but you're rather misleading. Actually, Minoru Yamasaki was an American architect. He even Studied at The University Of Washington and graduated in 1934. The towers were Co-designed by fellow Architect Emery Roth. The Building was a hull-core structure, Which is a traditional framework with its curtain-wall cladding is being superseded by a structure which consists of two concentric tubular walls, the hull and the core, with the floors spanning between them. Both walls are load-bearing and wind-resisting at the same time. The building was created to withstand such an event, not collapse in upon itself. Also the fuselage did not "explode" on impact. there is no fuel supply held in the fuselage, rather its held in the wings of the plane, which upon impact was scattered throughout the top floors as well as the exterior of the building. Whether or not its utter collapse was actually caused by the crash is still left to skeptics. there are proofs for both parties, as well as alot of seemingly odd missing information. Either way it was a horrible event.

this video even better explains the event according to Purdue University, which so happens to be a Largly Republican funded University. So there for still fought upon by skeptics, but still shows the best reconstruction of the event to date.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8

Yeah, i found out this info out, like a year ago so i didnt retain alot of it. Justh the main idea, I didnt mean 2 say the fuel tank exploded on impact either. It did explode and thats why, (as u said, was theorized) why the building collapsed on itself.

Heres a couple of questions, though. The south tower collasped 1st right? Did that plane explode 1st? That maybe why.

[Sport1.3]

Yeah, i found out this info out, like a year ago so i didnt retain alot of it. Justh the main idea, I didnt mean 2 say the fuel tank exploded on impact either. It did explode and thats why, (as u said, was theorized) why the building collapsed on itself.

Heres a couple of questions, though. The south tower collasped 1st right? Did that plane explode 1st? That maybe why.

Yes it did collapse first, but both planes exploded on impact according to the press release and witness testimonies. So it would have had to have been from either structural damage or the actual fire that made the 2nd hit collapse first

Well, i myself dont believe either side has all the facts. I dont believe (or wouldn't want to rather) that our own government would plot against its own ppl, as well as i dont believe we are getting whole truths from them either. There are way too many loose ends to believe either side. This is where its gets into a religion vs evolutionism type debate where both sides have just enough evidence to prove the others theory as questionable. Why did the 47 story WTC Buidling 7 collapse 7-8 hrs later, after the last tower fell and in the EXACT manner the towers fell, and never having been hit by more then small debris? where are the names/flight log from Flight 77, or press release of the black box contents? why is there valuable seconds missing off the Pentagon lawn camera tape? why did it take more then 2 yrs for the release the Pentagon Footage? How is it there is no Hard Evidence or proof from phone companies of calls made out from the Flight 77 before it crash landed, yet we are told this is how we know the identities of the suspects? Why werent there ever any bodies identified for flight 93, nor was there any actual physical evidence that it was infact a 747 that crash landed (i.e no debris)? how is it that the Exact side of the pentagon that was being renovated and was previously abandoned was hit by the Supposed shoot off the fly, random targeting terrorist? What is the cause of the small explosions from floor to floor as the Twin towers descend? etc etc....the questions can go on for DAYS!! none can be answered fully. If there is infact no conspiracy (which i would want to believe) then why is there so much Important information withheld?

[GSRteg®]

Well plz lecture us then!

/discussion

Unless you know anything about physics. I've sat through a weeks worth of lectures at Ga Tech where it was explained by one of the top physicists in the country. Not a conspiracy.

/discussion

[koukis14]

I am 100% sure in my mind that the Twin Towers did not come down because of the planes, I am also 100% sure in my mind that the Pentagon was not hit by a large airliner. The only thing I am not 100% sure about is who was behind it, what went down, and why?

If the government was behind the whole thing people would find out. There is not way a secret this big involving so many people could be kept secret. I think the government knew about it, let it happen, and helped it happen.

Or maybe they were caught with their pants down and do not want people know they did not detect terrorists in the towers setting up demo charges for weeks.

[GSRteg®]

Im with ya!

I am 100% sure in my mind that the Twin Towers did not come down because of the planes, I am also 100% sure in my mind that the Pentagon was not hit by a large airliner. The only thing I am not 100% sure about is who was behind it, what went down, and why?

If the government was behind the whole thing people would find out. There is not way a secret this big involving so many people could be kept secret. I think the government knew about it, let it happen, and helped it happen.

Or maybe they were caught with their pants down and do not want people know they did not detect terrorists in the towers setting up demo charges for weeks.