the dude is just trying to give out information, which i see none is false. The information regards the vehicle's past and which some of those mentioned events did occur but was not disclosed by the owenr. Why didn't he mention it? I don't know. If has nothing to hide, maybe the car would've been sold already. Perhaps the ownenr is treading on the fine line between ethical and not so ethical. However, the more information the owner provide, the higher chances the car might be sold, information that's both good and bad. SO problems might be solved but no accusatiions were made, so calm the fuck down.

Senko: go back to your little hole until the sun rises out of the west side.