Quote Originally Posted by FAHHQUE700
I don't see any Supras running a mid nine with more boost? Expect a little more.... hummm... here's proof... and there's about 4 other companies that have just reached 9's STOCK MOTOR, STOCK TRANSMISSION, & STOCK SUPERCHARGER... just more boost and a little nitrous. $40k, eh? I'm sure you paid more than what your car is worth.... TMV is 18-26k? for a car that is no where near as fast as a Cobra, Camaro, or Vette stock? and the Supras were alotta more new...
http://www.evoperform.com/GT500/9.wmv
What are you talking about? Are you trying to bash supras now? its flattering to hear every domestic fan to compare everything to a supra :jerkit: And you think bluebook values have anything to do with how much a car is actually worth? Wow. Its funny that a nice 1997 supra that costs $41k new is worth more than that now. How much is a 97 cobra worth in relation to its new cost?
A stock supra is much superior to that cobra...in every respect you can imagine... except straight-line acceleration. And keep in mind it came out over 13 years ago. I wonder how all the cars you mention (vette, camaro, etc) compared to it in 1993. If you think a stock non-supercharged mustang, c4/c5 vette, camaro, whatever can outrun a stock supra, you are incorrect.
You cant win an arguement about this, so lets get back on topic...
The $40k+ (some people are paying $50k for them) Shelby gets its ass kicked by stock corvettes, and it barely outruns a stock 03 cobra that costs far less. This thread is about stock cars...
Who cares if you can mod it up and put a bottle on it and run 9's on slicks. You can do that to a 1987 mustang 5.0 also, and for a lot less money. Some people dont live their life 1/4 mile at a time.