
Originally Posted by
Sinfix_15
He's not trying to "fit in". People dont gang up on you because we're in some type of forum clique that watches each other's back. People gang up on you because your stupidity sticks out. We're like minded in the sense that we all participate on this forum and when we cross over things you say that are grossly inaccurate or just outright lies, we comment. That is the only connection between anyone "attacking" you in this thread. The distinction between "groups" here is you being an irrational moron and not fitting in with rational intelligent people. Even in the face of undeniable evidence against your claims, you refuse to accept reality.
This is why i asked you, how do you convince a stupid person that theyre stupid? it's a real question. What do you do? do you point out inaccuracies in their statements? do you outline contradictions in their argument? do you take a poll? If your "truth" is illogical, how are you proved wrong with logic?
You said...... confidently and shamelessly.....
EVO is superior to a cobra.....
I should have picked a better year cobra....... since the "terminator" was not the car i chose.
A "terminator" would easily beat an EVO...... (but that isnt the one i chose)
And you said this in the manner of "i got him, he didnt specify the cobra and picked the wrong year"........
So at the time of your argument you believed that a "terminator" was a faster car than an evo......
So then we point out to you that there's no such thing as a terminator... that terminator is just a nick name.... also pointing out that the car i selected was in fact the "terminator" that you previously believed WAS in fact a faster car than an EVO.....
and even though you voluntarily admitted what we're trying to convince you of....... you still argue against a statement that you yourself had already stated was a fact.
Is any of this soaking in???/