Volvo VS new M5

[Fred Sanford]

G-tech Lmmfao

[R_Rated]

G-tech Lmmfao

I tell you I have a APC muffler... and you Lmmfao at the G-tech?

[Fred Sanford]

I tell you I have a APC muffler... and you Lmmfao at the G-tech?

Well I know APC is a joke, but you seem to really believe the G-tech is accurate.

[RJ's325ITS]

Well I know APC is a joke, but you seem to really believe the G-tech is accurate.

We got this frase that we used in the pit lane.. some data beats no data...

G-Tech might not be the most accurate but is data and any data acquisition on the level of racing we chat about in here is priceless. Besisdes that I remember one open track day at RA, when a guy I know was having problems with his GPS data acquisition system and I had to look up a AMB transponder for him... once again good for lap times only, but better some data that no data at all

[R_Rated]

Well I know APC is a joke, but you seem to really believe the G-tech is accurate.

so every magazine that has tested them and said they are right on is wrong? And after ... about 50 some 1/4 mile passes on a track and mine being scary close... all 50+ times were flukes? Just because you heard something from a freind who heard...

they ARE accurate IF you use them right. I do have dynos and timeslips to validate though. But more importantly, they are consistent. So, the way dynos are MEANT to be used... as a tuning tool; the Gtech works great for this.

[Fred Sanford]

so every magazine that has tested them and said they are right on is wrong? And after ... about 50 some 1/4 mile passes on a track and mine being scary close... all 50+ times were flukes? Just because you heard something from a freind who heard...

they ARE accurate IF you use them right. I do have dynos and timeslips to validate though. But more importantly, they are consistent. So, the way dynos are MEANT to be used... as a tuning tool; the Gtech works great for this.

Magazine racing are we? Scary close doesn't mean it's right. I could probably watch a car run the 1/4 and come as close as a G-tech. I know guys at the track who can do that and come scary close.
I stand by my opinion, G-tech is trash.

[R_Rated]

Magazine racing are we?......

I stand by my opinion, G-tech is trash.

isn;t that what everyone on this forum has done when they "judge" what a volvo R can do?

and your statement about the Gtech is pretty ignorant... If I set my Gtech right then it is right on par with the track timer... on SEVERAL tracks... and again, 50 times consecutively... before you share your expertise about Gtech, you should use one. then you can speak based on experience not out your asshole.

[Fred Sanford]

isn;t that what everyone on this forum has done when they "judge" what a volvo R can do?

and your statement about the Gtech is pretty ignorant... If I set my Gtech right then it is right on par with the track timer... on SEVERAL tracks... and again, 50 times consecutively... before you share your expertise about Gtech, you should use one. then you can speak based on experience not out your asshole.

Some of us actually know things about cars and aren't quick to label them all as slow or fast.
As for G-tech.....I have used one you retarded cockpuffer. I've also used the new Dashhawk. Neither are anything more than toys. Though I will admit Dashhawk is actually useful to monitor some engine parameters and is a lot easier than toting a laptop.