Thoughts Opinions. I like some didn't think it would be great but overall it ain't too bad.Graphics are pretty god. Seems like they took some stuff from the last one and carried it over. Haven't got online yet but will prolly do that tommorow
Thoughts Opinions. I like some didn't think it would be great but overall it ain't too bad.Graphics are pretty god. Seems like they took some stuff from the last one and carried it over. Haven't got online yet but will prolly do that tommorow
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
yeah still am not planning on getting it, just for the story mode. beta sucked, and thats about all it took!
Game is awesome playing right now! on ps3... played a little of the story mode and im playing online now. Levels are huge!
COD4 < COD5, been playing the beta for like 2 weeks now, got up to top 300, and since i pre ordered it, get the M1A1 carbine from the get go.![]()
been playing this for like 3 hours lol, online is cool but you have to get to level 18 to do hardcore mode which is what i play so ive been doing pretty crappy on regular team deathmatch. My k/d is still 2.7 or something though. Single player is bad ass the level where you start on the boat at the beginning is sick. Definitely better than i expected single player wise.
Gamertag: Antiv6 SVTftw
Yeah i only play hardcore too... im glad they have a lot more hardcore options this time. Is your gamer tag for ps3 or xbox
i played the beta on 360 live. i liked it. it's the same gameplay as part 4 modern warfare. im getting it that's all i can say.
i like it a lot!! i will pwn all you fools!! j/k but really, i will.xI DRIP Ix
Got this yesterday shits awesome! But help me! I'm playing single on campaign and I'm on the Russian part, I killed the sniper (after 400 tries) and now i'm in the burning building, I have to crawl and shit but right when I get to the stairs to go up I burn to death? This is on veteran(hardest)
hmm IDK. I just beat the game todayOriginally Posted by VQ35 Star
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
Got it yesterday with Antiv6 and i love it. The story mode is interesting and keeps you involved... and the multiplayer is great. Gamertag: Amerianctm10
Drip come show me you will own me :0 lol later
Who else like the airplane part. I thought that was cool.
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
so is it better than the beta was? That shit sucked hardcore the beta did. I hated it. Is the actual game much better now? Glitches all gone? Rofl-mutts still?
Originally Posted by blackboi50
Yea glitches are gone. THe maps for multiplayers are frickin SWEET. there are a lot of small maps too like vacant on COD4, But much more detail to the maps. THere are also more ways to play online like, playing co-op with ppl online, you can play competitive to see who scores the highest points in a campaign level, or just play it like it is single player but with more ppl, but it sucks when your stuck with a bunch of noobs and you have to revive them every 5 min. when you play on veteran, lol.
damn game is nuts...awesome thats for sure..
just really been doing multiplayer...
almost about to prestige...![]()
NIKON D90 | Sigma 10-20mm | 18-105mm | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600 speedlightNIKON Squad
is it as short as COD4?
Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
-www.usedbarcode.net
havent finished the campain yet..
but its hard as hell on veteran dont see myself finishing it anytime soon..lol
oh and zombie mode is fun as hell
NIKON D90 | Sigma 10-20mm | 18-105mm | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600 speedlightNIKON Squad
Yea it's about the same.Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
how is the multiplayer online copared to COD4?
i know they're taken place during a different time period and all but how is the gameplay? is it any funner? or just the same game played at a different time period?
no the campaign is longer ... and dont be braggin about your leaderboard rank in the beta i had everyone beat ... i like the online but the story is BADASS !!! i love where u get to snipe that one guy .. shit was bad ass !!! slow motion snipe then blood jus goes everywhere in slo mo ... i cant stand the juggernaut cuz u can kill someone faster with it than stopping power and the game being new right now there are WAYYYYYYY to many scrubs playing . ill stick to campaign and guitar hero . peace .Originally Posted by redGT
93 sol Si
95 sol S
95 sol Si
Just bought it last night and overall I think its better then 4. Only played 2-3 missions on solo. Online is where its at, you get tanks and dogs. Shit is crazy!
btw its not cod 5, cod 5 will be coming out later.
cod waw is awesome, better than cod4 imo..
Yea I guess your right. I cant decide if its better than COD4 or not though.Originally Posted by Frög
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
dude...veteran is hard as hell in this game, I can't pass the downfall part where the russians take Berlin and you have to blow up 4 of the big 88 guns. I've died about 300 times trying to pass that part, fucking unlimited nazi spawns and 8 grenades are thrown at you every 5 sec.![]()
this is 2nd to last level too! I want to play zombie mod!! and you can only unlock it if you beat the game.
veteran pissed me off a few times on cod4, from the looks of it its going to on this game too....ill buy it eventually..
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
dude veteran on cod4 isn't as bad as veteran on cod5. they have perfected the grenade toss back in the game also, you will literally play hot potatoes with the japs until it blows up. not only that, the toss grenades at you nonstop, i don't think i have ever been shot to death, only blown up many times.
yeah on cod4 the only time i had a problem with that is when your waiting for the chopper at the carnival grounds or whatever. other times it was just i wouldn't take my time. i still never beat the mile high club mission on veteran, that more of its not hard to beat, just hard to figure out exactly what the routine and timing of what they want you to do to get through is. looks like ill be having some fun on this one if its harder!Originally Posted by VQ35 Star
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
got it today, havent played the campaign but online seems pretty cool. i say its pretty equal to cod4, i just dont like the wwII scenery/guns as much. dogs are cool, and artillery seems alot better than airstrikes did.
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
Yea the carnival part was hard, not only waiting for the chopper but also trying to get to the chopper was hard as hell. I just played the c4s where they spawned and some close by and just waited.Originally Posted by Schugg
I've finally passed the part where you have to blow up the four 88 guns, shits hard you have to keep rushing or the nazis keep respawning, now I'm stuck on the part right after you blow them up, trying to get up the stairs into the parlament building.![]()
Its not COD5!!
World At War is not even developed by the same people who made COD4
COD 1, 2, and 4 were developed by Infinity Ward.
The piece of shit COD3 was developed by Treyarch, and now it seems they developed another piece of shit game, I downloaded the game for free, and deleted within minutes of playing. If you were stupid enough to pay $50 bucks for a WW2 COD4 mod thats not even that good, well than your a dumbass.
now Gears 2, thats a badass game.
yeah your right I went a little too far on the whole dumbass thing.Originally Posted by VQ35 Star
but gears of war 2 is so much better than WaW
WaW just feels like a cheap rip off WW2 mod of COD4. Which technically thats exactly what it is, Treyarch took Infinity Wards engine, reskinned it, added some really horrible and disjointed missions (granted they were a bit interesting since very few other games did the pacific front) threw together the exact same multiplayer, and then charged $50 bucks for it.
Gears has better multiplayer, better campaign, better graphics, better sound engine.
ehhh, i actually like WaW much better than cod4 and think that the maps are very well thought out, it makes it feel more wwIIish bc of the disorientated feeling you get and the enemy can be anywhere anytime you know? in cod4 you pretty much knew where the enemy would spawn next and could guess where they would be when UAV wasn't activated.
WHen I play gears2 to me it feels just like the 1st one with new maps and improved graphics/sound. The exact same thing you said about WaW, but i'm saying it about gears2, different strokes for different folks I guess. OH and I have nothing against gears, i loved the 1st one, just think they could of done better with the 2nd one.
We are comparing a 3rd person shooter to a 1st person shooter with different scenario aliens vs humans/ wwII. why are we comparing the 2 again?