SAY GOODBYE YOU BAGGY PANTSED FAGGOTS...

[BABY J]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/..._sagging_pants

Heh heh.

[§treet_§peed]

LOL

[mocha latte cupcake]

good i agree with it, its truly irritating to see people who have to keep a hand on their pants just to walk around and if they walk or run they trip because their pants have hit their ankles. fines are welcome'd

[gtikid]

Can this really be passed though? I mean I wouldn't mind if they do, but isn't that a bit ridiculous?

[Nismo]

OH SHIT, black people(not all), wiggers(disgraces), and asians(no comment) that think they are gangster will have to get clothes that fit. OH NOES

[Bruce Leroy]

I doubt that this will pass, and if it does, how are they gonna enforce it. Walk around underground and give everyone tickets?

Why don't people focus on shit that actually matters. Like getting genarlow wilson out of jail or something important.

[XanRules]

I doubt that this will pass, and if it does, how are they gonna enforce it. Walk around underground and give everyone tickets?

Why don't people focus on shit that actually matters. Like getting genarlow wilson out of jail or something important.

AMEN!!!

[blackshine007]

The proposed ordinance would also bar women from showing the strap of a thong beneath their pants. They would also be prohibited from wearing jogging bras in public or show a bra strap

Meh, I don't like the proposal. Though I hate seeing those lil' retards constantly pulling up their saggin pants, it also violate the constitution as well. Freedom of speech, well freedom of expression, basicly, alot of ethics are involved. I'm against it

[Ran]

Meh, I don't like the proposal. Though I hate seeing those lil' retards constantly pulling up their saggin pants, it also violate the constitution as well. Freedom of speech, well freedom of expression, basicly, alot of ethics are involved. I'm against it

Yes, because we can't express ourselves with our personalities or anything, we have to use our clothes.

+1 for this bill and I vote for nationwide school uniforms as well.

"This is a racial profiling bill that promotes and establishes a framework for an additional type of racial profiling."

Oh gee, who saw this coming. :jerkit:

[Ruiner]

I do wanna see thongs, though.

[Jaimecbr900]

I hope it does pass.


Freedom of what??? Are you kidding me? What about our freedom NOT to have to see people's underwear or them walking like they're penguins or wearing burlap sack looking clothes????

I wish it would pass. I'm sure it won't because of all the ACLU and NAACP and "leaders" that are gonna call it something else.

I'm with Ruiner, let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....

[©hris]

I hope it does pass.


Freedom of what??? Are you kidding me? What about our freedom NOT to have to see people's underwear or them walking like they're penguins or wearing burlap sack looking clothes????

I wish it would pass. I'm sure it won't because of all the ACLU and NAACP and "leaders" that are gonna call it something else.

I'm with Ruiner, let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....

agreed.... only reason people do it is to look cool.

who enjoys having to hold up their pants or pulling them up every few minutes....

i dont think this should apply to the ladies though lol i love those hip huggers

[blackshine007]

I hope it does pass.


Freedom of what??? Are you kidding me? What about our freedom NOT to have to see people's underwear or them walking like they're penguins or wearing burlap sack looking clothes????

I wish it would pass. I'm sure it won't because of all the ACLU and NAACP and "leaders" that are gonna call it something else.

I'm with Ruiner, let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....

I hate seeing the little douches and the white tees and dreads with sagging pants too. I think that, and solely the sagging pants thing should be addressed. Not the others. That's what I'm getting at. If you approve anything, approve the sagging pants thing.

[StupidBikerBoy]

I hope it does pass.


Freedom of what??? Are you kidding me? What about our freedom NOT to have to see people's underwear or them walking like they're penguins or wearing burlap sack looking clothes????

I wish it would pass. I'm sure it won't because of all the ACLU and NAACP and "leaders" that are gonna call it something else.

I'm with Ruiner, let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....

This is a joke. I would have thought you of all on here would realize it. It'll NEVER pass. This is part of our freedom. I dont like it either, but if something like this was to pass it would open the door for a lot more and worse. Whats next? Telling us which shoes we can wear?? If anyone thinks a law like this should be passed then then maybe you should consider what you think freedom is. Put your hate of the subject to the side, because it doesnt matter that they may ban baggy pants that show underwear, what matters is that they will be taking more rights from us. If I wanna walk outside in my boxers ITS MY RIGHT.

And if this passes, then we should ban shorts (very similar to boxers), bathing suits, and anything else that resembles underwear in any way. Don't you see the absurdity in this?? Who cares if you dont like it, its still a freedom of choice.

Thats the problem with this country today. Everbodies so worried about being PC. They dont want to hurt anyones feelings.

This country will be full of pussies in a few hundred years.

This problem should be address another way, but since they may actually require some thought and action out of our government it'll never happen.

The day this country takes on a dress code, I'll be moving or part of the solution.

[R3RUN]

I'm no psychologist but I would call it, being oversensitive about something that is not a big deal. I understand that you don't want your kids seeing it but theres alot of things in this world you don't want them to see that they are going to see. This is hardly one of them that deserves a law to be passed.

let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....

So this is okay for young kids to see but not some guys boxers. That seems right You killed your entire argument as soon as you said that. Sarcastic or not.

Listen, I love looking a beautiful woman naked. I'm a man, right? Does that mean that since that's what I like that I can suddenly move that from my bedroom to middle of anystreet U.S.A.? I see nothing wrong with it. It's just a beautiful woman. 99.9% of men standing around would agree there's nothing really wrong with it. So what would be the big deal about that? The Constitution protects nudist, right? So why can't I just endulge myself anytime and more importantly anyWHERE I feel like? I wouldn't be "hurting" anybody? It's just my way of "expressing" my inner wants and desires. It's my style. What's the difference between that and showing your UNDERwear in public? If YOU had children, would YOU want them to be walking down the street minding their own business and suddenly cut the corner to find two people screwing on the sidewalk? Why not? It is perfectly "legal" to have sex, right? It is perfectly "legal" to say you're doing that as a form of protest or because it's your "style". Why not?

Thats a completely different situation. Some guy showing his boxers is not even in the same realm of two people having sex on a sidewalk. If you think it is the same then you have some seriously strange values. Going by what your saying, perhaps we should outlaw short skirts, tube tops, and shorts. God forbid kids have to learn about human physiology.

[Jaimecbr900]

I'm no psychologist but I would call it, being oversensitive about something that is not a big deal. I understand that you don't want your kids seeing it but theres alot of things in this world you don't want them to see that they are going to see. This is hardly one of them that deserves a law to be passed.


So this is okay for young kids to see but not some guys boxers. That seems right You killed your entire argument as soon as you said that. Sarcastic or not.



Thats a completely different situation. Some guy showing his boxers is not even in the same realm of two people having sex on a sidewalk. If you think it is the same then you have some seriously strange values. Going by what your saying, perhaps we should outlaw short skirts, tube tops, and shorts. God forbid kids have to learn about human physiology.

Judging by your comments, you totally missed my points.

If it's so much an issue to "defend", why not "defend" the right to be nude in public IF this is truly a "constitutional" thing? I used the example of nudity to prove a point, not a factual representation of what I want. My point is WHERE does it end? It starts with something that seems benign, yet leads to something much more difficult to control. You either want to defend the constitution against SOME things or do you defend it against ALL things? Seems like all of you are saying that it's no big deal to wear your pants where your UNDERwear hangs out, yet it's not permissable to be naked. Why is that?

[R3RUN]

Seems like all of you are saying that it's no big deal to wear your pants where your UNDERwear hangs out, yet it's not permissable to be naked. Why is that?

There is a big difference between not being covered at all and having just one layer of clothing on. Going by your logic should we not also require people to wear more than one shirt.

[©hris]

heard bout that on the radio this morn

[Nismo]

Wiat no more sports bras? Thats goin to be a problem. Shoot down the proposal!

[ATK_Designs]

I say keep it like that. That way, we can tell who the losers really are and laugh at them.

[bigdare23]

I dont like it, but I doubt that would be passed thanks to the 1st amendment.

[Jaimecbr900]

I dont like it, but I doubt that would be passed thanks to the 1st amendment.

Ok, I'll bite.

The first Amendment of the Constitution is also part of the Bill of Rights. It states that the FEDERAL GOV'T can not make laws which prohibit, limit, hinder, or create RELIGION, SPEECH, PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY, PRESS, and GRIEVANCES.

Exactly what part of that Amendment applies here?

[bigdare23]

Ok, I'll bite.

The first Amendment of the Constitution is also part of the Bill of Rights. It states that the FEDERAL GOV'T can not make laws which prohibit, limit, hinder, or create RELIGION, SPEECH, PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY, PRESS, and GRIEVANCES.

Exactly what part of that Amendment applies here?

What is exactly "freedom of speech" to you?

According to Wikipedia

Freedom of speech is the concept of being able to speak freely without censorship. It is often regarded as an integral concept in modern liberal democracies. The right to freedom of speech is guaranteed under international law through numerous human rights instruments, notably under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, although implementation remains lacking in many countries. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes preferred, since the right is not confined to verbal speech but is understood to protect any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

So with that, it should be covered by the first amendment.

I disagree with sagging, but I disagree more with the government being able to tell you how you can where your clothes.

[Jaimecbr900]

What is exactly "freedom of speech" to you?

To ME, freedom of speech is the freedom to say anything you darn well please AS LONG AS you don't complain later about HOW you are treated for saying that. You can't use the shield of "freedom of speech" only to later hide behind it when it bites you in the ass for what YOU said. That's not freedom of speech. That's being a coward.

If you walk around with your ass hanging out and someone takes offense to that, then you should be able to defend your choice as something more than mere gay ass Politically correct "freedom of speech". WHAT exactly ARE you trying to "say"???? WHAT exactly ARE you trying to "express"? The irony is that people use that cliche of "I'm expressing freedom of speech..." yet they can't SAY two words coherently as to WHY they are doing what ever it is they are doing.

This is why I can't stand Political correctness. It is "OK" in the minds of SOME to FORCE the will of MANY. Squeaky wheel syndrome at it's best. So, eventhough we live in a society where we are supposed to have majority rule, what we really have is the loudest cry baby backed up by the most idiotic of theories asking for everyone ELSE to conform to what THEY want to do is the one that wins regardless if 99% of the rest of the country doesn't agree. Gotta love America.

I tell you what......I'm willing to bet any amount of money that if this was put up to a vote, it wouldn't even be close. Wanna bet?

I disagree with sagging, but I disagree more with the government being able to tell you how you can where your clothes.

Really? They tell you how to drive, when to vote, how to raise your children, who you can marry, force you to pay taxes, send you off to war if necessary.....yet they, in your mind, are not supposed to tell you to pull your pants up??? Why not? What you and others are suggesting is that in order to prove a point we should protest, right? Under the same theory, why don't we all get together one day and drag race down 85 just as fast as we damn well please. If we don't cause an accident, would we.....SHOULD we get away with it??? I damn sure don't agree with the 55, 65, or even 70 MPH speed "limit". My car can and does do twice that fast safely and without impeding anyone else. So why shouldn't I be allowed to do it? Same ideology applies here. I am in the minority when it comes to speeding on PUBLIC roads. So, I have to abide by the LAWS or deal with the consequences. This should be the same. Add the terminology necessary to include gay ass saggy pants to the ankles as part of "indecency laws" and deal with it.

They're not telling you WHAT to wear. They are telling NOT to show your UNDERwear. There is a HUGE difference.

[Nismo]

Its not racial profiling, wiggers do it too, god i hate them. Everytime I see a wigger it makes me sick.

[BABY J]

Its not racial profiling, wiggers do it too, god i hate them. Everytime I see a wigger it makes me sick.

not to single you out, but answer me this.

1) what is a wigger

2) what is a n*gger

[Ran]

not to single you out, but answer me this.

1) what is a wigger

2) what is a n*gger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N*gger (Replace the star with an "i" to reach the link)

Am I doin' it rite?

[BABY J]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N*gger (Replace the star with an "i" to reach the link)

Am I doin' it rite?

./thread_jack

Some1 who uses this term, IMO, feels that all n*ggers are black, or of another race OTHER than white. That is my point. If you are a ignorant n*gger, then you are an ignorant n*gger - that does not tie you down to a particular race or "color" in my eyes. A white boy w/ his pants hangin off his ass, should I be inarticulate enough to have to resort to the term, would still be a n*gger to me... not a wigger.

kill -9 thread_jack

carry on

[SL65AMG]

not to single you out, but answer me this.

1) what is a wigger

2) what is a n*gger

a white ni**er.... dont try to be ignorant man. and not all blacks are n***ers.... and not all whites are wiggers...obviously. but i think ive tried to express this point before.


this "law" wouldnt apply to all black people.... only the _______rs. and then whoever else wears idiotic looking clothing (whites, asians....blah blah)

but not being able to wear a sports bra in public.... what the hell?

[CSquared]

a white ni**er.... dont try to be ignorant man. and not all blacks are n***ers.... and not all whites are wiggers...obviously. but i think ive tried to express this point before.


this "law" wouldnt apply to all black people.... only the _______rs. and then whoever else wears idiotic looking clothing (whites, asians....blah blah)

but not being able to wear a sports bra in public.... what the hell?

Regardless of whether or not you are white or black... that might have been one of the most ignorant posts to grace the pages of IA... Congratulations.

[SL65AMG]

Regardless of whether or not you are white or black... that might have been one of the most ignorant posts to grace the pages of IA... Congratulations.

im glad you think so...

opinions are like assholes, everyones got one. if you dont like my post, ignore it and move on with life. it doesnt affect you. refusing to believe the truth is ignorance, my friend, and the world is full or ignorant people that will believe anything just so that it makes them happy and doesnt hurt theirs or some one else's feelings. so therefore if the truth hurts your feelings, be a man and ignore it.

[DrivenMind]

Everytime I see a wigger it makes me sick.

No ****, I just pull out my 92FS and put it to my temple until the Wigerstorm passes.

My favorite ones are the ones that come from a $200,000 home, and want to tell you about how ghetto their life is in East Cobb, or Ackworth. Are YOU ****ING KIDDING ME?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Just because you smoke weed, and drink beer doesn't mean your a ****ing gangster ***** boy.

akndsfgkanfdsgkasfngasgogjinepifg

[SLOWLYbtngU]

But the penguin walk is hilarious esp when they are chasing after a girl and then they have to grab the buckle of the belt that is supposed to hold up the pants he is trying to keep on his waist...That is great entertainment!!!

[BABY J]

I was behind a guy at a Shell gas station who had to reach down behind his knee to get to his back pocket to pay for gas. Re-fuckin-"dickless". LOL. Even worse, on COPS when idiots are running from the cops pulling up their pants, I sit and wonder - "did you really think this through kid?"

I hope it gets passed - but in reality, this shit should be handled at home - 1/2 the probs w/ idiots I meet in public stem from the lack of home-training. We have this "well it's not my kid" mentality and that sucks. I am only 28, but growing up in Griffin, if some1 saw me driving my Stang like an idiot (and they did) my mom/dad knew about it before I got home.

It truly does take a community to raise a child... and it takes a community IGNORING a child for them to end up at Shell station looking for their back pocket behind their knees. It's NOT sexy.

[tony]

This means women wont be able to go running in sports bra's either..I mean there are women that play in our flag football league with shorts and a sports bra, are cops going to give them tickets too? First time its appealed I'm sure it will be thrown out of court promptly.

[Jaimecbr900]

This means women wont be able to go running in sports bra's either..I mean there are women that play in our flag football league with shorts and a sports bra, are cops going to give them tickets too? First time its appealed I'm sure it will be thrown out of court promptly.

See, this is the problem with politicians.

They try and shove in all these ridiculous things into an otherwise perfectly good bill. So then, when it goes up for a vote, it gets turned down.....NOT because people don't agree with 99.9% of what it requests, but because that .1% of crap that's thrown in there. They should just make the bill really simple....."NO underwear to be showing in public, period."

[JDMjoe]

Yeah I don't really care either way, i woudn't mind NOT seeing dudes asses, but women in sports bra is a different story

[§treet_§peed]

i hope it passes for guys and leaves women free to let us see

[BABY J]

^^ I'll buy that for a dollar. YUP!

[§treet_§peed]

BUT I LIKE SEEING YOUNG HOT WOMEN WALKING AROUND IN UNDERWEAR!! just no old women.. they should make a rule that all women above 28 cannot walk around in public just underwear on and leave younger ones ok to..