"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
LOL
You know better; next time will be a ban.
good i agree with it, its truly irritating to see people who have to keep a hand on their pants just to walk around and if they walk or run they trip because their pants have hit their ankles. fines are welcome'd![]()
Can this really be passed though? I mean I wouldn't mind if they do, but isn't that a bit ridiculous?
FUCK GRAN TURISMO EAST!! NEVER TAKE YOUR CAR THERE, ESPECIALLY NOT FOR AN ALIGNMENT!! TERRIBLE BUSINESS!!![]()
OH SHIT, black people(not all), wiggers(disgraces), and asians(no comment) that think they are gangster will have to get clothes that fit. OH NOES
Originally Posted by blackboi50
I doubt that this will pass, and if it does, how are they gonna enforce it. Walk around underground and give everyone tickets?
Why don't people focus on shit that actually matters. Like getting genarlow wilson out of jail or something important.
Meh, I don't like the proposal. Though I hate seeing those lil' retards constantly pulling up their saggin pants, it also violate the constitution as well. Freedom of speech, well freedom of expression, basicly, alot of ethics are involved. I'm against itOriginally Posted by yahoo news
K series 626. That's right. It's got a K in it.
I do wanna see thongs, though.![]()
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
heard bout that on the radio this morn
Wiat no more sports bras? Thats goin to be a problem. Shoot down the proposal!
Originally Posted by blackboi50
I hope it does pass.
Freedom of what??? Are you kidding me? What about our freedom NOT to have to see people's underwear or them walking like they're penguins or wearing burlap sack looking clothes????
I wish it would pass. I'm sure it won't because of all the ACLU and NAACP and "leaders" that are gonna call it something else.
I'm with Ruiner, let the girls show their thongs, but make the guys pull up their pants.....![]()
Yes, because we can't express ourselves with our personalities or anything, we have to use our clothes.Originally Posted by blackshine007
![]()
+1 for this bill and I vote for nationwide school uniforms as well.
Oh gee, who saw this coming. :jerkit:Originally Posted by Seagraves
Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
agreed.... only reason people do it is to look cool.
who enjoys having to hold up their pants or pulling them up every few minutes....
i dont think this should apply to the ladies though lol i love those hip huggers
I hate seeing the little douches and the white tees and dreads with sagging pants too. I think that, and solely the sagging pants thing should be addressed. Not the others. That's what I'm getting at. If you approve anything, approve the sagging pants thing.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
K series 626. That's right. It's got a K in it.
I dont like it, but I doubt that would be passed thanks to the 1st amendment.
Its not racial profiling, wiggers do it too, god i hate them. Everytime I see a wigger it makes me sick.
Originally Posted by blackboi50
But the penguin walk is hilarious esp when they are chasing after a girl and then they have to grab the buckle of the belt that is supposed to hold up the pants he is trying to keep on his waist...That is great entertainment!!!
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
I was behind a guy at a Shell gas station who had to reach down behind his knee to get to his back pocket to pay for gas. Re-fuckin-"dickless". LOL. Even worse, on COPS when idiots are running from the cops pulling up their pants, I sit and wonder - "did you really think this through kid?"
I hope it gets passed - but in reality, this shit should be handled at home - 1/2 the probs w/ idiots I meet in public stem from the lack of home-training. We have this "well it's not my kid" mentality and that sucks. I am only 28, but growing up in Griffin, if some1 saw me driving my Stang like an idiot (and they did) my mom/dad knew about it before I got home.
It truly does take a community to raise a child... and it takes a community IGNORING a child for them to end up at Shell station looking for their back pocket behind their knees. It's NOT sexy.
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
not to single you out, but answer me this.Originally Posted by Nismo
1) what is a wigger
2) what is a n*gger
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
This means women wont be able to go running in sports bra's either..I mean there are women that play in our flag football league with shorts and a sports bra, are cops going to give them tickets too? First time its appealed I'm sure it will be thrown out of court promptly.
i hope it passes for guys and leaves women free to let us see
You know better; next time will be a ban.
Ok, I'll bite.Originally Posted by bigdare23
The first Amendment of the Constitution is also part of the Bill of Rights. It states that the FEDERAL GOV'T can not make laws which prohibit, limit, hinder, or create RELIGION, SPEECH, PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY, PRESS, and GRIEVANCES.
Exactly what part of that Amendment applies here?
See, this is the problem with politicians.Originally Posted by tony
They try and shove in all these ridiculous things into an otherwise perfectly good bill. So then, when it goes up for a vote, it gets turned down.....NOT because people don't agree with 99.9% of what it requests, but because that .1% of crap that's thrown in there. They should just make the bill really simple....."NO underwear to be showing in public, period."![]()
^^ I'll buy that for a dollar. YUP!
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
BUT I LIKE SEEING YOUNG HOT WOMEN WALKING AROUND IN UNDERWEAR!! just no old women.. they should make a rule that all women above 28 cannot walk around in public just underwear on and leave younger ones ok to..![]()
You know better; next time will be a ban.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiggerOriginally Posted by BABY J
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N*gger (Replace the star with an "i" to reach the link)
Am I doin' it rite?![]()
this is onr of the dummest proposals ive heard in a bit, i think all the hot chicks should march the capitol in thongs and sports bras or no bras...... :boobies:
You only live once, maybe twice if you use the e-brake!
I'm tired of seeing guys with hariy toes wearing sandals. Its offensive to me. Ban open toe sandals.![]()
Sandals don't bother me, but flip-flops are one of the worst f*cking inventions ever.Originally Posted by Nick
*Pip-Plop* *Pip-Plop* *Pip-Plop* *Pip-Plop*
Geezus, shut the f*ck up with the noisy @ss shoes!![]()
./thread_jackOriginally Posted by Ran
Some1 who uses this term, IMO, feels that all n*ggers are black, or of another race OTHER than white. That is my point. If you are a ignorant n*gger, then you are an ignorant n*gger - that does not tie you down to a particular race or "color" in my eyes. A white boy w/ his pants hangin off his ass, should I be inarticulate enough to have to resort to the term, would still be a n*gger to me... not a wigger.
kill -9 thread_jack
carry on
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
Why?Originally Posted by The Whiteboy
Why? Because it raises a standard of decency?Originally Posted by The Whiteboy
Infringement on personal expression is a load of crap. If that were the case, then people could walk around nude claiming that it's their freedom of expression and the government can't constrict that.
Exactly. People are quick to judge someone by what they look like. Its bs.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Huh?Originally Posted by Nick
If you roll around w/ dogs - do not be surprised if you stand up w/ fleas. Why would want to project any image of yourself that is not true to life?Originally Posted by Nick
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()
they are also saying that about bra straps and thongs showing
VAL FOR PRESIDENT
the aclu is filing suit against saying it is racial profiling
VAL FOR PRESIDENT
So... there is only 1 race that busts slack? This suit will get laughed at.Originally Posted by BlackSiChic
"I'm not a gynecologist... but I'll take a look."![]()
![]()