Printable View
In megapixels yes, but in class systems no, they are both brand's entry level cameras, and they share similar cheap technology pentamirror viewfinders(instead of pentaprism) cheaply built plastic bodies, etc. etc.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarzanman
Its a bit disingenuous to compare class when the feature set is as different as it is (as cameras go) due to the difference in age/generation.
What you are suggesting is similar to saying that a 2002 Accord is the same as a 2007 Altima because they are in the same class. (or vice-versa... a 2002 Altima compared to a 2007 Accord).
Look down the feature set and performance of the cameras and then tell me again that they are 'the same'
They are both the CURRENT entry level cameras, it still applies, anyway, I'e found Canon and Nikon often have a stepladder of competition, rather than an equality, likeQuote:
Originally Posted by Tarzanman
D60<XSi<50D<D90<D300<5D Mk II loosely
Wow. 40 to 40. That funny. Usually one of them is sky rocketing over the other in other forums. NEVER seen a tie.
canon 1d > d3
d3x>1dmk3
Quote:
Originally Posted by YokotaS13
opinion < factsQuote:
Originally Posted by xbn83
guys, stop worrying about which is better.
x2Quote:
Originally Posted by 87 Turbo II
its more actually
user > *
d3x > 5dmk2 <1dmk3Quote:
Originally Posted by xbn83
R2D2 > Johnny 5