FINALLY GOT MY NEW CAMERA SETUP TODAY!
Well all my new stuff finally came in. Here is a list and a quick picture of the setup.
Canon Digital Rebel XTi
Canon BG-E3 Battery Grip
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro
Tamrac Adventure 7 Backpack
A-Data 2GB 120x CF Cards (Qty: 3)
Additional Canon NB-2LH Battery
Here is a quick pic:
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
dAmn homie.. you ballin.. Some very nice gear...
Thanks Man!Originally Posted by EJ_Allmota
dAmn homie.. you ballin.. Some very nice gear...
Now I need to learn how to use the camera....lol. This is my first dSLR.
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Damn you started on the higher end.. Im going to be starting with a so called DSLR beginner level Nikon D40.. Cant wait to see the photographys you capture with that joint..
Hell yeah! Dont you love new and fresh gear? LOL
should of stayed away from the rebel gear.
nikon.
nice, i've got the same bag. but all my stuff is nikon, can't wait to see some pictures
And why is that, please explain.
rut roe
lots of reasons I guess...
Red-eye reduction beam from lamp compared to strobe from actual speedlight on Rebel XT. Beam is easier for subjects to distinguish from actual flash firing. (Less eye blinking effect).Compatibility with older lenses including manual focus Nikkor lenses (AI-P and D type), and non-CPU.Higher resolution LCD playback monitor with 130,000 pixels compared to 115,000 on Rebel XT.Exposure compensation +/- 5 EV compared to +/- 2 EV.
Hmm someone can read DPReview. I haven't had any of those issues and neither has speedminded.
yep, and I can read photographycorner.com and photozo.com hmmmmm
but hey, whatever...brand preference.
I'm guessing rich bought a package deal, so it's a good starting point
I dont wish to partake in a war between Nikon Vs. Canon but out of the box the sensors on the Nikon do have an advantage over Canon. It has been proven that the Canon LCDs show more blueish hues and colors that arent true matches to what you would see on a LCD monitor.
But both Nikon and Canon have great equipment.
it's all good, both have their flaws here and there but I guess I'm just a nikon fanboy
Nice setup, wish i had gone for an xt, i stuck with the nikon group, either way you made a good choice. figured out what your gonna shoot mostly? you also might consider a wide angle lense at some point, a 12-24mm is usually a good complement. never know when you'll want that wide shot. (theres also a thing about the lenses and sensors on dslr's are off by some 1.5x scale, so a 24mm lense will give you the same equivelent shot as a 35mm slr film camera.)
awesome setup man! you will love it!
I wont get in the war either, besides saying white lenses are for gays.
that is all
"The 1911 is a collection of subsystems that must work together. Each part must be prepared and fit properly not only in and of itself, but also with regard to the other parts with which it must operate for the gun to function and appear as desired."
Now that I agree with. It seems that if you are on this board you are either Pro-Nikon or Pro-Canon. There is no inbetween. Your first post was typical response to another brand purchase. Personally I have shot with both Canon and Nikon and liked both. I just prefer the canon.
Redeye issue, lolol...never once has that been an issue and i have redeye reduction turned off.
In low light situations with equivalent lenses I say Nikon has Canon beat. As for the color issues, we've shot the D200 next to Canon during all day shoots [even using a light meter] and I prefer the Canons look...but honestly it doesn't matter b/c between Raw conversion and Photoshop you can make any picture look however you want.
What it comes down to it use both...borrow, rent, or whatever and play with both for a day or weekend. I don't like the way the Nikon feels, it doesn't fit my hands. If you're like some of us, your camera becomes an attachment to you for the better part of the day. It's like shoes, you can have the best shoe in the world...helium filled soles with built-in flux capacitor and everything else imagineable that enables you to fly but none of it matters if doesn't fit.
My two pixels
Thanks for all the comments!
I chose Canon mainly because that is what I am used to and have used for years. Each has their benefits and flaws. It just comes down to personal preference. I am upgrading from a Canon A620 and a Canon S40 before that.
I did not do a package deal. I pieced this setup together based on the best quality lenses that I could get for my budget. I also got to see Jaime's setup, which was a help......except he has the pimp daddy f/2.8 version of the 70-200 L lens.
I will be playing around with the setup and will post pics....the ones I am not ashamed to post.If I can only get past this cold I have, I will be fine.
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Redeye issue, lolol...never once has that been an issue and i have redeye reduction turned off.
In low light situations with equivalent lenses I say Nikon has Canon beat. As for the color issues, we've shot the D200 next to Canon during all day shoots [even using a light meter] and I prefer the Canons look...but honestly it doesn't matter b/c between Raw conversion and Photoshop you can make any picture look however you want.
What it comes down to it use both...borrow, rent, or whatever and play with both for a day or weekend. I don't like the way the Nikon feels, it doesn't fit my hands. If you're like some of us, your camera becomes an attachment to you for the better part of the day. It's like shoes, you can have the best shoe in the world...helium filled soles with built-in flux capacitor and everything else imagineable that enables you to fly but none of it matters if doesn't fit.
My two pixels
LOL @ built in flux capacitor....
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Very nice Rich. I see you heeded some advice......very nice young man.....
Anytime you want to play, call me and we'll go out to shoot somewhere.
BTW guys, the Canon vs Nikon thing is really moot. Both are at the top of the heap when it comes to DSLRs, and I think everyone will agree on that. Once you get comfortable with either, that's when you start taking some great shots. Hand a good photographer either, and eventually they'll take great shots with either. That means to me it's more about the person behind the camera than the camera itself in this debate. Yes, you can microdisect and put it under an electron microscope to see that Nikon has 2 less dust particles per thousand on a 10 mega pix shot at f2.8 on a cloudy day back in '32......but really does that even matter in the grand scheme of things if the pic SUCKS.......
BETTA RECOGNIZE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BETTA RECOGNIZE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I knew you'd catch that.....
Very nice Rich. I see you heeded some advice......very nice young man.....
Anytime you want to play, call me and we'll go out to shoot somewhere.
BTW guys, the Canon vs Nikon thing is really moot. Both are at the top of the heap when it comes to DSLRs, and I think everyone will agree on that. Once you get comfortable with either, that's when you start taking some great shots. Hand a good photographer either, and eventually they'll take great shots with either. That means to me it's more about the person behind the camera than the camera itself in this debate. Yes, you can microdisect and put it under an electron microscope to see that Nikon has 2 less dust particles per thousand on a 10 mega pix shot at f2.8 on a cloudy day back in '32......but really does that even matter in the grand scheme of things if the pic SUCKS.......
Thanks Jaime! I will surely call you, as I would like to get tips from a pro.
Back in '32! LOL....you mean when Brett was born!
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Umm, pro no, friend yes.
See, everybody got my funnies right away on that one.....Back in '32! LOL....you mean when Brett was born!
How do you like the Sigma lens?
Love it!
Rich...Bob...Stan...?????
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
